Webmaster Tools vs. Google Trends data doesn't add up
-
I am investigating a two-month 25% drop in organic traffic from Google to a client's site. When I turned to the Webmaster Tools data for the site, there is a clear, gradual drop over the course of a couple months both in impressions and clicks. In general, the drop occurred across many pages and for a large number of queries; there wasn't a core group of keywords or pages that saw the drop...it was more sitewide. Yet, the average rankings reported by WMT were, for the top 100 or so landing pages, not significantly different.
The site hosts information about medical conditions, and I wouldn't expect any time-related variations in search volume, and this was confirmed by looking at Google Trends data for a number of the top keywords. I started to look at the data by query for all the top keywords (all ranked in the top 10), and saw the following general trend: impressions were down, rankings stayed in the top 10, and Google Trends showed either flat or rising volumes.
So I am trying to make sense of that. If the search volume trend did not decline and rankings held inside the top 10, then how could the number of impressions drop significantly? Am I trusting the WMT data too much? But the reality is that the volume of traffic measured by Google Analytics from Google organic did indeed drop the way Webmaster Tools show it.
-
You're welcome! One last suggestion I'd make is if you have the budget, to augment Moz rankings with daily rank tracking. Weekly might be enough, but if you want to turn it up a notch try Authority Labs. I find them accurate and robust for daily rank tracking.
-
We have WMT data monthly, and are setting up a Moz campaign for the site so that we'll have weekly de-personalized data moving forward. Will also take a look at the SEMrush data. Thanks for the suggestions.
-
Also, you can try to see if SEMrush has any past ranking data - depending on the volumes, you might find something: http://www.semrush.com/
-
I wouldn't call it inaccurate, it just operates a bit different. For example;
- It's only when a page ranks - the "avg position" is only when someone actually searched, and the page ranked somewhere - it does not calculate a hypothetical ranking
- It's averaged over time periods - when you are looking at average ranking - the time period can muddy numbers. Shifting in actual ranking over 2-3 months might show an "average" position of 5, but actual could have been 5, 2, 7, 15, 1, 6, etc over time
- It's averages for logged in, logged out, search plus your world etc - rank checkers give a constant number based upon trying to de-personalize. But WMT is averaging personalized rankings, G+ "search plus your world", localized rankings etc - which is a muddy number as well.
In short - tracking rankings give you a steady ranking eliminating changing variables. I'm sure WMT is accurate, but there's a lot more moving parts so it's suspect to these things and can not be looked at as "rankings" but rather an actual look at where you happened to rank when a page did show up in someone's search.
-
For that time period we don't have a second source of rankings data. Should there be reason to believe that the Webmaster Tools ranking data is not accurate?
-
I think your first step should be to verify rankings with another tool. Hopefully you've tracked rankings somewhere else? Do you see any changes there?
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Google Optimize via Google Tag manager not working properly
Hi All, I am using google optimize via tag manager. I have successfully implemented it and my experiment appeared in google analytic but google optimize chrome addon always give me add script not installed properly. How to solve solve error? Thanks!
Reporting & Analytics | | amu1230 -
Google webmaster tools hiccup?
Our flagship website, up until March 16 was getting 1600 impressions and 300 branded clicks per day as per GWT. After 3/16, branded search fell to 300 impressions and 25 clicks per day. Our rankings haven't changed, and neither has our traffic. We would definitely notice the decline in GA and Core Metrics, and it is running about the same. according to GWT, 75% fewer people started searching for our brand on 3/16, but all of our other metrics are indicating otherwise. Has anyone seen this before? Is it a tracking issue on our side?
Reporting & Analytics | | AMHC0 -
It appears there's a problem with our connection to your Google Analytics account. Please go to your Settings page to update your connection.
I keep getting this error though I have confirmed I have the correct information. Any recommendations?
Reporting & Analytics | | x3oadmin0 -
Google Analytics: Multi channel funnel
Hi 🙂 I have a little problem. In Multi-channel Funnel Overview I see 50 conversions from Paid Search (screenshot 1). But when I click on Assisted Conversion and then choose Paid Search, I see 31 Assisted Conversions and 32 Last Interaction Conversion. (screenshot 2) So my question is - why the number of converstions in overview (50) is different than number in Assisted Conversions (assisted or last interaction conversion, or both together)? Probably, the answer is so simply, but I can found out it! 🙂 thanks a lot. X6UihL7.png lCNsw4T.png
Reporting & Analytics | | visibilitysk0 -
Google Analytics - In-Page Analytics
I had a strange thought waking up this morning, and was curious to hear other people's opinions on it. In Google Analytics, under Content > In-Page Analytics, Google shows what links on your site pages get clicked and how many times plus other metrics. Do you think they use that data for ranking back links so-to-speak? What I mean is, say I had a back link to my site on example.com, and example.com had google analytics installed. Google can see through google analytics whether my link has been clicked on. Say that my link gets no clicks, do you think that Google would use that metric against my site deeming it "not popular" or "not a good resource", even if example.com was a very popular site? And it could work the other way. Say my link got thousands of clicks on example.com, do you think that Google might use that to promote my site? I couldn't find any other discussion on this anywhere, so am not sure if people have already thought about this.
Reporting & Analytics | | THB0 -
AW Stats vs Google Analytics
Hey Moz Community, I am looking to get opinions on the best practice for analytics/traffic analysis. From experience I know that AW Stats reads high and Google Analytics reads low for traffic for reason in this article http://www.smartz.com/blog/2009/01/23/analytic-confusion-%E2%80%93-awstats-vs-google-analytics/ It drives me a little nuts how far off both are for some pages. I have one article that shows 100 views (GA) and AW stats shows 5 times that number of views. Any suggestions or systems you recommend? Thanks
Reporting & Analytics | | johnshearer0 -
Weird drop in ranks... google.fr
Hello folks, Before our domain: <cite>www.convertisseurvideo.net</cite> Keyword: convertisseur video ( convert your video ) is at the first(page) google.fr for this keyword search. Right now, its at second page, really dropped. And our CTR = 1% . How can we improve the CTR? Any toughts ? Thanks. ss.JPG
Reporting & Analytics | | augustos0 -
Google analytics tracking
Is their a built-in or easy way to track the amount of times an exit link is clicked on a page and show that with other links of the page. For instance: I had a page with several external ad links on it and I want to track how many each got and rank them in google analytics
Reporting & Analytics | | insitegoogle0