Filters for referral bots ineffective
-
I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong here. I've been trying to block spam from my client's analytics for over a month and I just can't seem to get it right. I am beyond frustrated.
Here is a list of the filters I have:
And here is referral traffic from them regardless:
Specifically this is what the filter looks like. Am I doing something wrong here?
I have also put a filter in place to block traffic from Russia, and it doesn't seem to be working 100% either.
On top of that, it seems anytime I do manage to block something, another site just pops up in its place. Is it endless?
My clients are very small local business and this is absolutely ruining their analytics. I can't even show them their traffic reports since it's absolutely meaningless with all this spam. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
-
Thank you for the quick response. Made the changes you suggested and hopefully over the next few days I'll see the effect.
-
The filter verification takes a small sample of data and sometimes in that sample there won't be any change.
Another reason for what you may get this error is because the filter was saved before the verification, so you will have to delete the filter and create it again for the verification to work. Better yet you can use the filter expression in a segment it will give you a better idea of how the filter will work since the segment is not limited to a few days.
If you try to exclude by the offender don't use referral as a filter field use Campaign Source.
For the filter based on valid hostnames, there is no need to put the domain with and without "www" clientsite.com will match both.
Hope that helps,
-
I've tried the method you suggested for one of my client's sites. I created a new filter, did "Include" -> "Hostname" and added the following:
translate.googleusercontent.com|www.clientsite.com|clientsite.com
It said that it wouldn't change any of the data when I went to verify the filter, which should not be the case. Most of the traffic is from hostnames that are not set. I tried this input as well after reading a different article on the subject:
translate.googleusercontent.com|www.clientsite.com|clientsite.com
Once again to no effect.
So I tried to tackle the referral spam itself (although for this particular site, direct traffic seems to be getting a fair amount of spam as well). I created two filters ( http://imgur.com/ShhAYqv ) that included every spam referral I've ever gotten:
adviceforum.com|social-buttons.com|semalt/.com|free-share-buttons.com|buttons-for-website.com|best-seo.com|darodar.com|semalt.com
dailyrank.net|sitevaluation.org|trafficmonetize.org|4webmasters.org|100dollars-seo.com|webmonetizer.com|event-tracking.com|.*(social-buttons.com)
And, as you can see in the picture, it says there would be no effect.
Aghhhhhh! What am I doing wrong here?
-
I have recently followed Carlos' blog posts and have to say the steps worked a treat. Hopefully the Google Analytics team are working on a way to transfer filters across different analytics accounts to make it easier to keep all sites referral traffic free.
-
Hi Kat,
If you want to exclude the spammer you should use Campaign Source as a field type, instead of predefined filter use:
- Filter type Custom > Exclude
- Filter Field > Campaign Source
- File Pattern Box enter the spammer you want to exclude. You don't need to create a different filter for each one; you can create an expression like this:
4webmasters.com|free-share-buttons.com|trafficmonetize.org|morespammers
The backslashes before the dots "." and the dashes "-" are needed because custom filters use Regular Expressions. You can keep adding up to 255 characters after that you have to create another filter
If you want to try a better solution, I recommend you to try a filter based on your hostnames.
This solution requires a little more time to set up, but it has three huge advantages over the Campaign Source solution- You will stop the spam before it hits you, adding a filter for the referral after you see it will stop it, but by the time you apply it you will have already hits of the spam.
- You will need only ONE filter to stop all ghost spam, instead of creating various sets of filters.
- Lately, some of the spammers(e.g. free-social-buttons) have been hitting GA accounts with fake direct visits along with the referral, the filter for the referral won’t stop the direct visit, on the other hand. The Valid hostname filter will stop ghost spam in any form whether it shows as a referral, keyword or direct visit.
This is what I've been using on my accounts for, the last moths and I haven't received a single hit of ghost spam the vast majority.
Here are a detailed guide and more information about all these solutions and spam in Google Analytics.
http://www.ohow.co/what-is-referrer-spam-how-stop-it-guide/
Hope it helps,
-
I've tried setting up filters in the manner you explain on your site, and yet when I go to verify it, it says that it wouldn't affect my data. I most certainly have spam data from the last seven days so I'm uncertain why it's not working.
I entered in names just as you did in your article, excluding from a campaign source:
dailyrank|sitevaluation|trafficmonetize|4webmasters|100dollars-seo|webmonetizer|event-tracking|free-social-buttons
-
You need to set the exclusion for campaign source, and not the ISP domain.
I highly recommend setting an include only filter for your own hostname.
https://www.marceldigital.com/blog/2015/06/stop-ghost-spam-in-google-analytics
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Why would on-site search queries show up as referral traffic?
The site analytics have been set up for over a year and suddenly last month there was a huge spike in referral traffic (1100+ sessions). Upon further investigation, the majority of it was coming directly from internally, either as mysite.com or search.mysite.com and the landing pages from the referrals are all /search.html?query=* This was never an issue before so I'm trying to understand what could have changed. I'm following up with the client to find out if their dev team may have changed anything related to their search engine but I'm wondering if there may be another explanation. A few notes: previously mysite.com / search.mysite.com were not in the Referral Exclusion list. I've added them now but this was never an issue before. Thanks in advance!
Reporting & Analytics | | SEMnMs0 -
Referrals - How is it possible I have 5 new users and 100 sessions over a 2 week period?
I have a referral from an email (2), android search(1) and another website(2) but my sessions is 100 over a two week period? I have NO returning visitors (still session data though?) Seems unlikely that just these 5 users have generated 100 sessions!! Any ideas?
Reporting & Analytics | | darrenbooy0 -
Referral Data Q's
1. We recently ran a promotion on both FB and Reddit, which is https, linking to our non-https site. We utilized UTM links to our landing page. Our GA campaign data returned extremely low hits in comparison to what we actually received (and recorded via FB/Reddit dashboard). Obviously our Direct traffic spiked during these times, caused by a secure to nonsecure referral, I'm sure. I'm also noticing a spike in referral traffic from lm.facebook.com that correlates to the ad times. Does this mean Facebook's link shim is stripping away my UTM data? My question is why we receive SOME properly UTM-tagged referral traffic in our campaigns? What's allowing some of it to go through? 2. I've tagged our email signature links with UTM as well, hoping to clean up some of our Direct traffic. I understand that external clients like Outlook and Thunderbird likely won't pass referral data, but do hosted clients like Gmail, Yahoo, and such? And if so, would the https to http difference obstruct this again? I'd love some insight onto these questions, especially if I'm off the mark with a few of my assumptions there.
Reporting & Analytics | | kirmeliux0 -
Google Analytics View Filters
Using the same GA property, I would like to set up three filtered views: 1. Tracking across one subdomain and one primary domain (example: shop.example.com & example.com) 2. Track only primary domain (example.com) 3. Track only subdomain (shop.example.com) Can this be achieved by using view filters? If so, how do they need to be set? Also, according to this article: https://mza.seotoolninja.com/blog/cross-domain-subdomain-tracking-in-google-analytics, with cross domain tracking, I need to ignore self-referrals, which can only be done at the property level. If set up to ignore example.com referrals, will this cause problems with filter 2 and 3?
Reporting & Analytics | | Evan340 -
Direct traffic spam on Google Analytics: how can you identify and filter it?
One of my smaller clients noticed a huge jump in direct traffic visits last month. The bounce rate was around 97% so I'm pretty certain that most of the traffic was illegitimate. I know how to filter out spam referrals and organic keywords in Google Analytics. However I'm not sure what to do about direct traffic spam. Are there recommendations for filtering this out? Can I identify spam IP addresses?
Reporting & Analytics | | RosemaryB0 -
Weird referral data. Spam?
Hi all, a few of my sites are suffering from referral spam. I read a couple of articles here on how to exclude them from your traffic using htaccess but today I was going through some referral stats of the company I work for and I noticed a lot of referral traffic coming from prod2.ssosecure.com I didn't find any article telling me this is spam, so it could also be an intranet of one of our clients where they are sending their employees to our application. Anybody a clue what this could be?
Reporting & Analytics | | jorisbrabants0 -
Why doesn't Google seem to care about referral spam?
In researching the issue of referral spam, there is no shortage if info, both on MOZ and beyond. But, neither the Google Analytics Blog or Help Forums seem to mention the issue at all. I'd think it is something that they would want to get rid of, yet it seems like they don't even acknowledge that it exists. Anyone have insights into this? Am I missing something, or is Google strangely silent on an issue that is becoming more and more annoying for anyone trying to use GA data?
Reporting & Analytics | | irapasternack1 -
Spooky goings on from bots?
Buon pomeriggio..... I have a clients whos data shows that they have very high visitor traffic between 1 AM & 5AM. Prevoisly I have been advised on this forum to search out and filter out bot traffic but i can find anything 😞 But i just want to know where can i spot theses obscure things described here:
Reporting & Analytics | | Nightwing
http://www.lunametrics.com/blog/2013/09/05/filter-bots-google-analytics/#sr=g&m=o&cp=or&ct=-tmc&st=%28opu%20qspwjefe%29&ts=1380528080 in google analytics. Ive followed stacks of tutorials and all i find out is i have Browser internet explorer behing the busiest traffic at 2AM 😞 Perhaps the time report is jinxed, but illustrated here is whats triggered the concern 😞
http://i216.photobucket.com/albums/cc53/zymurgy_bucket/vampire-data2-_zpsbe023697.jpg So if anyone could give me simple what to do in analytics and be v gratefull!
Grazie,
David0