Better page optimization for specific locations
-
I have a client that gets great ranking in a certain city mainly because that is their main corporate office and the address and city name is all over the place in their content. I am about to embark on getting them higher ranking in other cities as well and am looking for the best approach to make that possible.
My thoughts...
1- create seperate content for the other locations, but the body information would probably end up looking duplicate, but I could be more specific with title, description and content realting to that specific city.
2- add the additional cities to the current content???
Need some expert advice.
Thanks
-
Hi Corey, "My initial thought was to build out a single page for each of the locations he wants to rank for, and then build deep links to those pages. Obviously I would make the content as unique as possible, but there would certainly be some overlap." Yes, this is the way to go, but keep the overlap to a absolute minimum. Thinking about this from a keyword perspective, each city term = 1 keyword. Obviously, you can optimize any page for 15 keywords, so while it won't hurt to mention your service cities in a few places (homepage, about etc.) you shouldn't think of this as optimizing for them. Rather, think of this from a user perspective. The user will want to know if you serve in his city, so it is good to list all the places you serve in a few prominent places, but the actual optimization work really needs to hinge on individual content about those different cities. Hope that helps! Miriam
-
Miriam,
I have a similar situation where:
-
My client is a Windows Installation company
-
He is located 30-45 minutes from ~15 cities with 50,000+ population/each
-
He is currently ranking well for the largest city nearby (2.5M population), but wishes to rank higher for these other smaller locations.
Since there's about 15 cities that he will be wanting to rank for, the only way I could really add those cities to his other pages is to include a list of "locations we service" on each page, otherwise it won't read well for the users (i.e. "We will come to you in city1, city2, city3,...,city14, city15").
My initial thought was to build out a single page for each of the locations he wants to rank for, and then build deep links to those pages. Obviously I would make the content as unique as possible, but there would certainly be some overlap.
So the question is.. do I try to rank my main pages for all the locations, or do I make new pages for each location.. And, if it's the former, how do I go about doing that? If I list the locations like I mentioned, then I'm only getting the location keyword on there once, and it won't be in the H-tags, title, or multiple times throughout the page.
-
-
Hello Brant!
Thanks for coming to Q&A with your excellent question. I'm the Local SEO Associate here in the forum and will do my best to give a helpful answer. I'm going to respond in reverse order to the questions you've put.
On your second question - should you add the additional cities to the current content - the answer is, yes, probably, in a modest manner.
So, for instance, let's say your client's homepage is optimized for San Francisco, because this is where he is physically located. Let's say he is a plumber. In addition to serving San Francisco, he also serves clients in neighboring Oakland, Berkeley and Mill Valley. In such a case, there is no problem with including a mention of this on his home page. Something along the lines of: We Come To You in San Francisco, Oakland, Berkeley and Mill Valley.
There might be a few other pages on the site where such language would be appropriate and not detrimental.
But, this leads to your first question.
On question number one, I would encourage you to discuss with the client whether he is truly committed to going about this in the right way. If you simply put up pages for each of this service cities but don't make the effort to write truly unique content for each of the them, then it's not something you could really call a user-centric, commendable effort. One or two elements might be the same (as in the case of the plumber, a list of services such as septic backups, appliance overflows, clogged drains, etc.) but apart from that, everything should be unique if the client's heart is in the right place about this. I like to teach my own Local SEO clients to make their efforts for the benefit of their clients. Recognition of effort from the bots usually follows hand in glove with this if the person doing the writing understands Local SEO.
So, ideally, what you'd be looking at is a combination of simple mentions of the service cities on a few pages, and then a strong page of original writing for each of the service cities. These can then, of course, be added to main menu of the site, increasing its overall optimization for a wider set of terms.
Hope this makes sense.
I'd like to finish with a note and a question. Note: the client needs to understand that Google will always see him as most relevant to his city of location. Unless he is in a rural area or an industry with little competition, he should not be expecting these efforts to help him outrank his competitors in other cities in the local results. The point of this type of content development is most typically to gun for organic rankings, typically below the local results. Important to let the client know that.
And, finally, I did want to verify with you that the business model I am describing (along the lines of a plumber) matches that of your client. Does he want to rank for other cities because he goes to clients in them to do business, or is this not that type of business?
Cheers!
Miriam
-
In my personal opnion, you should include additional cities for the current content. You already have pages with goog PR and backlinks. If you create new pages, you will need to work on SEO from beginning.
One good solution is to make use of alt image texts and inside your website content. It will be easier and faster than creating new pages.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Home page optimisation
It's not possible to add a keyword to the homepage url. Do we still add a secondary keyword along the primary one on the home page title and meta description etc. How do we make our primary keyword to dominate in this case. Thanks
On-Page Optimization | | Timberwink0 -
Landing page separate from product page
Hello there, I have a wordpress website with a woocommerce plugin. I have 4 landing pages that describe my products and at the end of the pages, I have a CTA to my product page. is it bad for SEO? my website: https://relationadviser.ir
On-Page Optimization | | Aaron.be1 -
Category Page Content
Hey Mozzers, I've recently been doing a content audit on the category and sub-category pages on our site. The old pages had the following "profile" Above The Fold
On-Page Optimization | | ATP
Page Heading
Image Links to Categories / Products
Below the Fold
The rest of the Image Links to Categories / Products
600 words+ of content duplicated from articles, sub categories and products My criticisms of the page were
1. No content (text) above the fold
2. Page content was mostly duplicated content
3. No keyword structure, many pages competed for the same keywords and often unwanted pages outranked the desired page for the keyword. I cleaned this up to the following structure Above The Fold
H1 Page Heading 80-200 Word of Content (Including a link to supporting article)
H2 Page Heading (Expansion or variance of the H1 making sure relevant) 80-200 150 Words of Content
Image Links to Categories / Products
Below the Fold
The rest of the Image Links to Categories / Products The new pages are now all unique content, targeted towards 1-2 themed keywords. I have a few worries I was hoping you could address. 1. The new pages are only 180-300 words of text, simply because that is all that is needed to describe that category and provide some supporting information. the pages previously contained 600 words. Should I be looking to get more content on these pages?
2. If i do need more content, It wont fit "above the fold" without pushing the products and sub categories below the fold, which isn't ideal. Should I be putting it there anyway or should I insert additional text below the products and below the fold or would this just be a waste.
3. Keyword Structure. I have designed each page to target a selction of keywords, for example.
a) The main widget pages targets all general "widget" terms and provides supporting infromation
b) The sub-category blue widget page targets anything related and terms such as "Navy Widgets" because navy widgets are a type of blue widget etc"
Is this keyword structure over-optimised or exactly what I should be doing. I dont want to spread content to thin by being over selective in my categories Any other critisms or comment welcome0 -
Changing Location & Losing Location Based Keywords
We're a web agency, and we've just moved from Bromley to Sevenoaks. Our website ranks really well for all Bromley led keywords and regularly brings enquiries, but we're no longer based in Bromley. We don't want to lose our rankings, but clearly we can't claim to be based in Bromley when we are now in Sevenoaks. Obviously, we also need to start using Sevenoaks to build up traction for searches in our new area. So the question is - should we create a Bromley or Sevenoaks focused landing page (or both)? Should we change all references of Bromley to Sevenoaks across the site in one go or gradually? Would it be terrible to leave Bromley onsite? Thanks!
On-Page Optimization | | Ecce0 -
Word structure on page optimization
My question is this. I have a scrabble dictionary site and I list a ton of words on the page. I removed then as links just in case Google might be thinking i am spamming, but could there be a difference in listing words like this word1, word2, word3, word4, word5 and instead like this word1 word2 word3 word4 word5 could the first way trigger Google that I am spamming?
On-Page Optimization | | cbielich0 -
Best SEO extension or plugin for on-page optimization
I was wondering what you guys might recommend for a browser extension or plugin that would help developers optimize each page for specific keywords. I'm looking for a tool that will give me a grade on how well it's optimized with a recommendation checklist. I would use SEOMoz's onpage analysis tool but it doesn't have access to my private development environment (hence the need for a plugin.) Recommendations? Thanks!
On-Page Optimization | | net32SEO0 -
Internal Linking - Same page
Is there any benefit in internally linking back to the same page? I have no other relevant pages in the site I can link to so wondering if it's worthwhile to use anchor text to link back to the same page?
On-Page Optimization | | Will_Craig0 -
Avoiding "Duplicate Page Title" and "Duplicate Page Content" - Best Practices?
We have a website with a searchable database of recipes. You can search the database using an online form with dropdown options for: Course (starter, main, salad, etc)
On-Page Optimization | | smaavie
Cooking Method (fry, bake, boil, steam, etc)
Preparation Time (Under 30 min, 30min to 1 hour, Over 1 hour) Here are some examples of how URLs may look when searching for a recipe: find-a-recipe.php?course=starter
find-a-recipe.php?course=main&preperation-time=30min+to+1+hour
find-a-recipe.php?cooking-method=fry&preperation-time=over+1+hour There is also pagination of search results, so the URL could also have the variable "start", e.g. find-a-recipe.php?course=salad&start=30 There can be any combination of these variables, meaning there are hundreds of possible search results URL variations. This all works well on the site, however it gives multiple "Duplicate Page Title" and "Duplicate Page Content" errors when crawled by SEOmoz. I've seached online and found several possible solutions for this, such as: Setting canonical tag Adding these URL variables to Google Webmasters to tell Google to ignore them Change the Title tag in the head dynamically based on what URL variables are present However I am not sure which of these would be best. As far as I can tell the canonical tag should be used when you have the same page available at two seperate URLs, but this isn't the case here as the search results are always different. Adding these URL variables to Google webmasters won't fix the problem in other search engines, and will presumably continue to get these errors in our SEOmoz crawl reports. Changing the title tag each time can lead to very long title tags, and it doesn't address the problem of duplicate page content. I had hoped there would be a standard solution for problems like this, as I imagine others will have come across this before, but I cannot find the ideal solution. Any help would be much appreciated. Kind Regards5