From #2 TO Not Found in top 100 Results, WTF?
-
So my website was #2 for a targeted keyword on google.
(6 months ago: # (3 months ago: #6) (1 week ago: #2).
As you can see, it was moving up nicely, now it's not found on the top 100 search results.
Only appears #2/(B) in the local search section.
Could that be the reason? Websites that appear on the local search no longer appears in the SERP?
-
I agree with this. Seems like a penalty.
-
Hi Jorge, In answer to your question - yes - if your site has not achieved a high blended/local rank (you say you are in the B position) for its core term, it is very common for it to lose its organic rankings. Since around the time of the Venice update, it has become quite rare for a business to have multiple spots on page 1.
Prior to this, it was common for dominant businesses to have a local pack-style ranking as well as 1 or 2 organic spots, all on page one. Now, examples of this are few an far between, though they do exist. There has been some interesting chat about this going around the local sphere. On the one hand, heatmap studies have shown that those blended local results draw eyes to them.
See this great article by our Dr. Pete, here at SEOmoz: www.seomoz.org/blog/eyetracking-google-serps
On the other hand, since Google's removal of the 5 star rating and replacement of it with the Zagat rating, PPC on the side of many SERPs has those gold stars, so heatmaps might look a bit different today than they did in 2011. I have heard tell of several reports of loss impressions/actions for business owners in your position who went from a high organic rank to their organic ranking being subsumed into the local pack. And the whole stars vs. Zagat issue is becoming increasingly noted. Here is an excellent video and article from Matthew Hunt of Small Business Online Coach on this issue that I recommend you check out:
http://www.smallbusinessonlinecoach.com/blog/proof-google-places-zagat-review-lowers-actions/
Now, the truth is that it is still really important to achieve a high blended/local ranking. Most businesses are dying to get into the local pack, so you can feel good about what you've achieved with this. However, the ideal achievement would be to attain one of those rather rare accomplishments of getting both a high local ranking and a high organic one. This is not a well-documented process. Here's a piece from Adam Steele giving some tips about it, but it can be difficult to achieve:
http://www.nightlitemedia.com/2012/05/organic-and-google-places-ranking-on-page-1/
I know one Local SEO who actually offers training on this if you sign up for her complete program and that is Linda Buquet of CatalysteMarketing, so if you discover that getting a double rank on page one is vital to your phones ringing, you might want to consider hiring Linda for training.
Hope this response is helpful!
-
That can't be the reason. Sounds like a site or keyword over-optimization penalty.
-
Hard to say without knowing the domain or the keyword.
Fredrik
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Google search operator "site:" show different result.
Search operator "site:" show incomplete information. When I search with just domain name it show only 3 link that got crawl in past week, this is the link https://www.google.com/?gfe_rd=cr&ei=mLr3VfrhN4_BuATQuYugBg&gws_rd=cr&fg=1#q=site:sierralivingconcepts.com&safe=off&tbs=qdr: but when i look a specific link it show them in any time (search tools), https://www.google.com/search?q=site:http://www.sierralivingconcepts.com/p-6300-white-silver-regence-louis-xiv-mango-wood-ornate-hall-console-table.aspx&safe=off&biw=1600&bih=775&noj=1&tbas=0&source=lnt&sa=X&ved=0CBUQpwVqFQoTCJ-4iOLK-McCFQFwjgod43gI9A But when i look in cached page it says "appeared on 11 Sep 2015" I am total confused why google not showing all the new link that it crawl from my site.
Search Behavior | | Sierra-Living-Concepts0 -
Google Panda 4.2 Is Here
Most of you guys probably already know - but Google Panda 4.2 has began. I would love to keep an open discussion regarding anyone who was affected by the last Panda update along with changes for the good/bad during this new roll out in addition to what vertical you are in. PANDA TIME! Your web therapist, Chenzo
Search Behavior | | Chenzo1 -
Personalised Geo-targeted results - How does Google pass link juice?
Hello, Many websites now serve specific home page offers based on the location of the customer, my question is, how does link juice flow around a site when the links (this case from the homepage) are served up based on a visitors location? Internal links from your homepage are valuable for ranking that product well in the SERPs so how does Google deal with this? So, for example, a car hire website based in the UK. If you arrive on the care hire website sat in Manchester (Northern UK city), on the homepage the website serves offers of car hire deals in Manchester, Leeds, London and international destinations. If you arrived on this website from London (Southern UK City), you would not see the Manchester link at all but London, and other cities in the South. In this case, when Google crawls the car hire website, it will see internal links but a)which version and b) is there any way of sharing this link value around? Basically, we want to understand if Manchester in this case will get the benefit of an internal homepage link from Google even though we only show Manchester to people FROM Manchester, OR, do Google only give juice based on one version of the website, a generic UK version? Or to put it another way, is there any way of cashing in on both geo-targetting the customer based on their location AND getting link juice from those geo-specific home page links? Perhaps there is some code or way of telling Google that people from Manchester (a certain % of our visitors) will see a homepage internal link for Manchester that will pass some small % link value?
Search Behavior | | xoffie0 -
Noticed Bing UK and Yahoo UK are almost exactly the same ranking results?
I've run a few keyword ranking updates today and I've noticed that Bing UK and Yahoo UK results are almost exactly the same? This is unusual, the results for these two engines rarely tally with one another. Is anyone seeing the same?
Search Behavior | | MiroAsh0 -
2 websites for 2 dealer locations or one website for both locations - Thoughts?
I'm trying to decide what would be the best option for my client. They are a car dealership group who own 2 dealerships about a half hour away from each other. The dealerships have the same name but are just located in different locations. One dealership is in a small city in competition with several other dealerships within the city. "Dealership name city name" The other dealership they own (Same dealership name) is located in a small town close to an even larger city. "Same dealership name small town name" My options are: 1. Creating 1 authoritative website optimized for all 3 locations. The 2 cities both dealerships are located in as well as the large city close to the small town. This option would be less time consuming, we would only have to earn links, citations & blog for one website. However we'd still need to have citations using both dealership addresses. So that's still double the work. This site would probably be more authoritative and we could have a page promoting each dealership & have shared vehicle inventory. We'd attach 2 Google+ pages using the different addresses & have both location addresses prominently in the footer of the site. 2. Create 2 separate websites for each dealership & target the surrounding towns/cities in their respective areas (even though both dealerships are only a half hour apart). This option is more time consuming as we'd have to earn double the amount of links. Work on citation building, blog for 2 websites etc. But we wouldn't be diluting our SEO by trying to rank for all 3 locations. We'd have a better chance if we focused on each locations separately on 2 sites. BUT the 2 sites would have less authority. What is everyone's thoughts? What would you recommend to be the best option. Money isn't an issue. Thanks so much for any help.
Search Behavior | | DCochrane0 -
Need to rank xxx.com to 2 locations
Hi, I have a voip service, currently my keywords are ranking good in US. But i would like to rank them for India too. As i am selling India based voip services. I have a single domain .COM and no country specific domain. Here what i am planning to do. I would change the setting in Google webmasters central to change the target country to USA. And then i will do on page seo to match keywords related to India. Is there anyother suggestions? please let me know.
Search Behavior | | Dexx220 -
Website coming up in omitted results for search term?
Hi, My website is coming up in omitted results for search term. Now I have heard before if this is the case then its mainly due to a duplicate content penalty. But the content I used is unique and produced by a copywriter so its good. Its a new site and was in the results for about 2 weeks, I changed the non www to www in webmaster tools 1 day ago and now its sitting in omitted results. In webmaster tools I had to add the domain twice one non www and one www. Both accounts I hooked up a sitemap. Is it just because the site is new and its just working out where to rank me? Just so you know the non www was indexed for the 2 weeks changed it in webmaster tools so I wanted the www one indexed and now gone into omitted results. Cheers
Search Behavior | | activitysuper0