Repetition of Product Names considered Spamming?
-
We have long lists of products are displayed on individual web pages ... with the only variations being in product dimensions and prices.
Could the Search Engines consider these lengthy lists of products for sale to be attempted spamming efforts?
(Example: http://www.just-insulation.com/overview_of_celotex_product_buy_cheapest.html)
Thank you.
-
Yes I would think Google would consider it spamming - there are wat too many instances of Celotex in the copy.
I would look for places to remove instances of Celotex where not needed.
|
Celotex TB4012
|
1.2x2.4 = 2.88m²
|
12
|
0.50
|
2.00
|
0.50
|
1.44
Celotex TB4020
|
1.2x2.4 = 2.88m²
|
20
|
0.90
|
1.11
|
0.72
|
2.07
Celotex TB4025
|
1.2x2.4 = 2.88m²
|
25
|
1.10
|
0.91
|
0.85
|
2.45
Celotex CW4025
|
20x0.45x1.2 = 10.8m²
|
25
|
1.10
|
0.91
|
0.85
|
9.18
Celotex FR5025
|
16x1.2x2.4 = 46.08m²
|
25
|
1.10
|
0.91
|
1.00
|
46.08
Celotex PL4025
|
26x1.2x2.4 = 74.88m²
|
37.5
|
1.20
|
0.87
|
9.06
|
678.41
Celotex TB4030
|
1.2x2.4 = 2.88m²
|
30
|
1.35
|
0.74
|
0.98
|
2.82 ETC
Celotex FR5030
|
?x1.2x2.4 = m²
|
30
|
1.35
|
0.00
|
1.16
|
0.00
Celotex TB4035
|
1.2x2.4 = 2.88m²
|
35
|
1.55
|
0.65
|
1.11
|
3.20
Celotex FR5035
|
?x1.2x2.4 = m²
|
35
|
1.55
|
0.00
|
1.32
|
0.00
Celotex TB4040
|
1.2x2.4 = 2.88m²
|
40
|
1.80
|
0.56
|
1.26
|
3.63
Celotex CW4040
|
12x0.45x1.2 = 6.48m²
|
40
|
1.80
|
0.56
|
1.26
|
8.16
Celotex CG5000
|
12x0.45x1.2 = 6.48m²
|
40
|
1.80
|
0.56
|
1.48
|
9.59
Celotex FR5040
|
?x1.2x2.4 = m²
|
40
|
1.80
|
0.00
|
1.48
|
0.00
Celotex CG5000
|
0x0.45x1.2 = 0m²
|
90
|
1.85
|
0.54
|
2.55
|
0.00
Celotex EL3050
|
x0.6x1.2 = 1.44m²
|
50
|
1.85
|
0.54
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
Also way too many instances in the copy, less is more with new Google algorithms.
Celotex have rebranded their improved products the '4000' series. For example, Celotex GA3000 becomes Celotex GA4000 and Celotex XR3150 changes to Celotex XR4150. These changes reflects Celotex's improvement in product performance, and highlights the improved thermal performance of the boards.
Title and meta descriptions are too long
<title>Celotex Rigid PIR Insulation Boards GA4000, TB4000, XR4000, CG5000, CW4000, EL3000, FF4000, FR5000, PL4000, SW3000, PL4000, TA3000, TC3000 and TD4000\. All available from Just Insulation, UKtitle> <meta name="<a class="attribute-value">Description</a>" content="<a class="attribute-value">Buy your Celotex insulation boards online at the very best prices, sa fely and securely. Celotex high performance polyisocyanurate (PIR) boards offer an unrivalled range of thic knesses from 12mm – 200mm with products suitable for pitched and flat roofs, walls, cavityies, and floors ... along with a Class O fire rated product range for when project specifications demand enhanced fire performance.</a>" />
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Can I safely block my product listing from search? Does it even make sense?
Hi, I've an ecommerce website with more than 50k urls and only 10% or so are getting crawled regularly by Google.
Technical SEO | | GhillC
Product listing pages represent roughly 80% of these 50k pages. Trying to improve this, I was thinking to remove altogether all (most?) of my product listing from search (via Robot.txt) to keep only the product pages themselves and the product categories. My organic situation since Jan 2019:
Users: 2,300,000 (of which 9% are visiting product listing pages)
Page views: 8,000,000 (of which 5% are product listing pages). Am I about to unleash armageddon (or more like harakiri) on my website by doing so or actually get Google to crawl much more relevant resources (product pages, product categories, blog content and so on)? Thanks,
G0 -
Bing result title is displaying a competitors name
When searching "Cambridge Savings Bank" which is the specific name of a bank in Bing the search results return with them as Number one with the correct URL. The issue is Bing has titled the search result "East Cambridge Savings Bank" (which is another entity all together) and still has the correct www.cambridgesavings.com URL. So basically Bing is putting another corporation's name on our website. This issue only is in Bing. Any idea how to correct this? 2.png 1.png
Technical SEO | | BOD20081 -
How to remove number of products in your Google SERP?
I want to remove number of product appearing in search result. Sharing the screenshot as reference. ecrUriH
Technical SEO | | RaviM0 -
Knowledge Graph product carousel: The mystery of ranking
When you search for software-related terms, Google serves a carousel-style item above the organic listings. I've been assuming this is part of the Google Knowledge Graph. See http://imgur.com/a/TQpM5 The mystery lies in the selection of companies that are included in this carousel: the brands included are completely unrelated to the brands that rank well in the "normal" organic search listings. Giving that more color, here are the top 5 brands in "normal" organic search listings, for the query "invoice software," noting where they appear in the carousel: BRAND // normal organic search position // carousel position Wave // 1st // not present in carousel Quickbooks // 2nd // 1 NCHSoftware // 3rd // not present in carousel Invoicely // 4th // not present in carousel Freshbooks // 5th // not present in carousel Inversely, here are the top 5 in the carousel, noting where they appear in the "normal" organic search listings, again for the query "invoice software": BRAND // carousel position // normal organic search position Quickbooks // 1st // 2nd Zoho Office // 2nd // 9th Invoicera // 3rd // 15th Hiveage // 4th // 30th Apptivo // 5th // not present in first 10 pages of search results Here's an annotated image of the same thing: http://imgur.com/a/0Pa6j
Technical SEO | | RobM416
--I represent a brand (I'd rather not mention which) that ranks super well in the normal organic search listings, but doesn't rank accordingly in the knowledge graph carousel. WHAT WE'VE TRIED implemented Schema markup updated Wikidata information updated Wikipedia information We've reviewed the code on the pages that DO appear in the carousel, and haven't found any common threads. Several weeks have passed since those initiatives. We've been re-indexed in that time, but are still not included in the search carousel. I've seen people suggest resources like this
https://searchenginewatch.com/sew/how-to/2299454/4-google-carousel-optimization-tips
but those tips aren't addressing this problem. Also, things like claiming your business or other local business validation (which we've done) don't seem material to a non-local product search (but stranger things have happened, I know...). A couple of SEOs have suggested AMP, but I've yet to see any authoritative info suggesting a link between AMP and desktop results. Any help appreciated! I will report back on my findings. This is a follow-up to a question I previously posted here: https://mza.bundledseo.com/community/q/kinds-of-organic-search-results-google TQpM5 0Pa6j0 -
Changed all product titles, lost google schema markup in listings. Temporary?
We changed all of our product titles to be way shorter and less keyword stuffed last week. Short of dropping a few places in rank for most keywords (we assume temporarily) that all went fine. What we didn't expect was to loose all the schema data in our google listings from product pages. Price, and review stars are missing. Has anyone seen this before?
Technical SEO | | monkeyevil0 -
Leveraging "Powered by" and link spam
Hi all, For reference: The SaaS guide to leveraging the "Powered By" tactic. My product is an embeddable widget that customers place on their websites (see example referenced in link above). A lot of my customers have great domain authority (big brands, .gov's etc). I would like to use a "Powered By" link on my widgets to create high quality backlinks. My question is: if I have identical link text (on potentially hundreds) of widgets, will this look like link spam to Google? If so, would setting the link text randomly on each widget to one of a few different phrases (to create some variation) avoid this? Hope this makes sense, thanks in advance.
Technical SEO | | NoorHammad0 -
I am able to point an old domain name to part of my site
hi, i have a domain name to a site that i have but i am thinking of closing that site down and transfer it to a site that is popular. I want to know if i am allowed to point the domain name to a section of my site and if so would it benefit my site or should i just continue running the other site and make it better. would the links to that site be transfered to my site any advice would be great.
Technical SEO | | ClaireH-1848860 -
How do you stop Wordpress spam
What's the best way to stop Wordpress spam? We don't let comments go live without moderation, so the spammers don't succeed, however it wastes time going through the comments. A captcha code could work but a lot of software can crack it. Are there any good captcha solutions or could something else work better/in conjunction? Also, is there anywhere to report spam IP addresses? Not sure much happens when you mark a comment as spam in Wordpress.
Technical SEO | | giantpeach1