Why has Google started to re-write my page titles?
-
Since earlier this week I've noticed that Google has started to re-write several of our page titles and I'm not entirely sure why - does anyone have any info?
We are a UK business and currently have top spot for the keyword 'toilet cubicles' - however, our index.html page title has changed as follows:
FROM: Toilet Cubicles | WC Panel Systems for Washrooms | Cubicle Centre
TO: Cubicle Centre: Toilet Cubicles | WC Panel Systems for Washrooms
Is this Google favouring a more brand-led approach to search? Be interesting to hear everyone's thoughts...
Cheers,
Craig.
-
Ha, excellent Robert. I have to agree there are far more interesting topics than toilet cubicles but good to hear the site was informative! Thanks for your response above, very sensible point. If we drop a few in the rankings you have given me something to consider here. All the best. Craig.
-
Brian,
I wrote a response to this, hit post reply and then got an error message from moz. This will be shorter.
Where are you seeing the reports of this or is it something with sites you control? The reason I ask, is I would love to see any examples to see if there might be a change occurring.
My guess is that the issue with Craig and Cubicle Centre is that the whole page is around Cubicle Centre and the targeted keywords are the Toilet Cubicles and WC Panel systems. With everything being Cubicle Center, those terms are being moved by Google's algo. All important on site SEO is around Cubicle Center.
It would be interesting though if there is a change afoot. If you could let me know for any you see I would like to look at them.
Thanks,
Robert
-
Craig, I have to add that I now know more about toilet cubicles than ever before! Wow. I did not need that info;)
As to an additional interesting component, when I did non personalized search in US, you are ranked 2nd and on Google.co.uk you are first for toilet cubicles even though Google has affected it. Not too shabby.
Best
-
Craig
I just looked at this and the title tag is what you have for FROM and when you look at the SERPs, you have the title moved as you say in TO.
This has nothing to do with Google and branding, etc. Here is a good quote from WMT:
Google's generation of page titles and descriptions (or "snippets") is completely automated and takes into account both the content of a page as well as references to it that appear on the web. The goal of the snippet and title is to best represent and describe each result and explain how it relates to the user's query.
I suggest reading the whole page; I am trying to be brief.
Now, when you look at the content, etc. on your page (I use view source as it is easier to get there) you see that as a home page for Cubicle Centre you talk much more about cubicles than about toilets. Google's algorithm is inferring that you are a cubicle centre first. If you look at the others on your site not all have changed, just a few. But, on this page it makes total sense that the algo would change it. Your alt text, most of your links, etc. are around Cubicles and Cubicle Center. Not around Toilet cubicles. Your content is around cubicles and cubicle center as well.
I think the meta description is just generic enough that t has not been touched and is verbatim. I see more often where a meta description is changed than seeing titles change, but it really makes sense here. What you may want to do is reconsider what you are ranking the home page for (Typically your business like you have here.) The problem is you are actually trying to rank for three terms here: Toilet Cubicles, WC Panel Systems for Washrooms, and then your brand. That is diluting the other two because you are strong with the brand.
Hope this helps,
Robert
-
Craig
I just looked at this and the title tag is what you have for FROM and when you look at the SERPs, you have the title moved as you say in TO.
This has nothing to do with Google and branding, etc. Here is a good quote from WMT:
Google's generation of page titles and descriptions (or "snippets") is completely automated and takes into account both the content of a page as well as references to it that appear on the web. The goal of the snippet and title is to best represent and describe each result and explain how it relates to the user's query.
I suggest reading the whole page; I am trying to be brief.
Now, when you look at the content, etc. on your page (I use view source as it is easier to get there) you see that as a home page for Cubicle Centre you talk much more about cubicles than about toilets. Google's algorithm is inferring that you are a cubicle centre first. If you look at the others on your site not all have changed, just a few. But, on this page it makes total sense that the algo would change it. Your alt text, most of your links, etc. are around Cubicles and Cubicle Center. Not around Toilet cubicles. Your content is around cubicles and cubicle center as well.
I think the meta description is just generic enough that t has not been touched and is verbatim. I see more often where a meta description is changed than seeing titles change, but it really makes sense here. What you may want to do is reconsider what you are ranking the home page for (Typically your business like you have here.) The problem is you are actually trying to rank for three terms here: Toilet Cubicles, WC Panel Systems for Washrooms, and then your brand. That is diluting the other two because you are strong with the brand.
Hope this helps,
Robert
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Why is Google appending a different website's brand name to the end of SERP title?
I've recently been shown some SERP results where Google is appending a different website's brand name to the end of the SERP title. It's actually rewriting the brand's name to that of the other website. (This is obviously not ideal.) Why would this be? The other website doesn't even stock the same product, so there shouldn't be any confusion there. But even if it did, many websites stock the same products. Just confusing...
Branding | | Ria_1 -
Inclusion in the Google Knowledge Graph, Positive Benefits and Outcomes
Mozzers, Google has recently begun to include some of our blog content within its knowledge graph, Not our company data for the branded searches, but within the results for general FAQ style questions and queries common to our industry. In a couple of cases using our content over Wikipedia which was really pleasing 🙂 My thinking is that this is not just general luck but that google likes our technical blog content and even as far as to promote it themselves and sees us as authoritative in this industry/field ? I see this as an opportunity to continue publishing if anything increase the frequency for this style of content to build up authority in this sector in the hope that google will look at our brand and maybe even our search positioning favorably. (Similar to the idea behind author rank possibly?) Just wanted some general opinions from some knowledgeable Mozzers on this or if maybe i am thinking too far into it? Maybe there is something i should be looking at to further improve how favorably google looks at our content for inclusion in its knowledge graph? Thanks James
Branding | | Antony_Towle0 -
Should the Facebook page be just the brand name or also include keywords?
Hi. Do you recommend that a company's Facebook Page be just the Brand Name, or should it include some keywords in the title?
Branding | | JonsonSwartz0 -
Google is sticking it to E-commerce Companies right?
Hi all, Excuse the rant - but I'd be interested to hear others thoughts on this... I am completely disheartened by the Google Algorithm updates of the last 18 months. They seem to be completely geared up to making life much much harder for E-commerce companies to rank organically, and much easier for informational sites to rank organically, with the only exception being national or global brands that have millions of pounds to invest in off-line marketing like TV advertising. Is it not all a devious strategy by Google to ensure e-commerce companies have to pay for their traffic? It seems like if you genuinely want to compete organically as an e-tailer, without investing millions in off-line advertising, you basically have to become a publishing house as well as shop. My company sells building supplies. There are plenty of magazines and info-sites out there offering tips, advice, interactive tools etc. for how to build your own home, home improvement advice etc. But if I want to start getting 'natural' links, I have to become an online magazine and information resource as well and start competing with these other reputable info-resources - where is the sense in that? If house-builders want advice and information on building regulations, planning permission etc. they'll visit government information sites and other reputable online resources to get that information, if they want to buy materials they'll go to a shop. It just seems like Google is trying to make every site an information resource - how else are you supposed to get natural links without publishing 'sharable' information - no-one shares links to products really, well not building materials anyway - maybe sexy products like ferrari cars and super-duper laptops or sound systems, but no one is going to go "oh that's a really nice piece of timber, I'll share that with all my friends before I buy it". Just feels like it's getting harder and harder and more and more expensive to trade online. What's everyone else think? Luke
Branding | | LukeyB301 -
Google+ Pages and an unknown owner...how do I claim it or get it removed?
Hello, I am working on a clients social networking campaign and have found a Google+ page for their company. It looks like it was created approx a year ago. The client doesn't know who created it or what account has control of it in their network. I need to make a Google+ page for them so I can use it in their marketing that I can actually access. I was wondering if anyone has any insight on how I can either: Find the owner/email that is associated with the Google+ Page? or Have it removed so I can create a fresh one? which I know I can report the page as compromised but will that work in a timely manner? Please any thoughts or feedback would be greatly appreciated, and thanks!! 🙂 Jeff
Branding | | allstatetransmission0 -
Has anyone had success with product page rel=author? Can I protect the content but dump the face on the SERPS?
Hi, Is there a way to get the benefits of rel=author for protecting site content but to disconnect that from the face photo on the SERPS? We added rel=author to our unique and individually written product descriptions and reviews. This has led to a decrease in click thru thus far. I suspect this is because when searching for a product to buy the user sees the face and thinks "review" or at least "not corporate". I don't nec. want to dump rel=author in the sea yet for our ecom pages, has anyone had success with product page rel=author? Four our keywords, we are the only company of 10 well known travel sites that have the face in the SERPS, far from improving our CTR, it has trashed it. Any ideas?
Branding | | xoffie0 -
Social Profile for my business, where do I start
Hi, Today our business has no social presence so we are starting from the ground up. We have implemented the Google +1 button across the site, but nothing more. The social sites I'm considering targeting are: Linked In Twitter Facebook Google +1 I already have personal accounts used personal sharing on Linked In, FB and +1. I'm unsure whether I need to create a new facebook account for each of those and then create the business profile on each one or whether I should use my existing personal account. Further, for Google +1, there was no requirement to create any business page of any kind, all I had to do was take the code and insert it into the website. That confused me as for Facebook and Linked In, I was sure you must have an account up in order to have the social Like or Share button working Given I'm at the very start of this process, it would be great to get others input into how they went about this, and perhaps share any pitfalls they may seem obvious to avoid in hindsight. Thanks.
Branding | | fdep0