How complicated would it be to optimize our current site for the Safari browser?
-
Hi all! Okay, here's the scoop. 33% of our site visitors use Safari. 18% of our visitors are on either an iPad or iPhone. According to Google Analytics, our average page load time for visitors using Safari is 411% higher than our site average of 3.8 second. So yes, average page load time pages loading in Safari is over 20 seconds...totally unacceptable, especially considering the large percentage of traffic using it.
While I understand that there are some parameters beyond our control, it is in our own best interest to try to optimize our site for Safari. We've got to do better than 20 seconds. As you might have guessed, it's also killing conversation rates on visits from that browser. While every other browser posted double-digit improvements in conversion rates over the last several months, the conversion rate for Safari visitors is down 36%...translating into 10's of thousands in lost revenue.
Question for anyone out there gifted in Web design and particular Web Dev....Do you think that it's possible/reasonable to attempt to "fix" our current site, which sits on an ancient platform with ancient code, or is this just not realistic? Would a complete redesign/replatform be the more realistic (and financially sound) way to go?
Any insights, experiences and recommendations would be greatly appreciated. If you're someone interested in spec'-ing out the project and giving us a cost estimate please private message me. Thanks so much!
-
Thank you all so very very much. Matt, I am going to drop you a PM as you suggested. Paul, wow...thank you for sharing your insights here. I am sure this is extremely helpful information not just for me, but for many other folks here who've observed some of the same things on their sites. Yes, I agree that the conversion issue could very well be a mobile optimization problem and not a Safari problem as we have spent very little to no time optimizing our mobile site. Given the traffic levels coming in via that channel, it's probably time to get crackin'!
You guys are awesome!
-
Sorry Dana - totally missed your mention about conversions being down. In that case you'll want to do some head-to-head testing with webpagetest.org.
The other thing to consider is that over half your Safari traffic is from mobile, Is it possible there's a mobile-optimisation problem and not a Safari problem? (How do the other mobile browsers perform in comparison?)
And the last suggestion I just thought of: Pingdom now offers Real User Monitoring (RUM) that purports to also be able to track the page speed of Safari users. (It uses it's own javascript module you add to your pages.) Given that this comes free for 1 site even with their free plan, seems like it would be an essential step toward getting a better handle on just where and how big the issue actually is.
P.
-
Dana, the good news here is that you have probably been worrying for nothing.
The function GA uses for tracking page timing is simply not included in Safari or Safari for iOS (phone/iPads). So those Safari figures you are seeing are completely anomalous and totally unreliable.
Here's the chart that shows which browsers have the capability to report their page speed in Analytics.
http://caniuse.com/nav-timing
As you'll notice, both desktop and mobile versions of Safari are no-go.The bad news is, just because the GA timings are worthless doesn't prove definitively you don't have any Safari issues. By far the best way to assess the situation is to analyse whether Safari-based visitors behave significantly differently on-site. Is their bounce rate higher? Time on site or conversions substantially lower? If no substantial difference compared to other browsers, you don't have an issue. (Usually this is the case - a site that performs in Chrome and Firefox almost always performs about the same in Safari, in my experience)
The one option you do have to get actual speed tests is to use webpagetest.org and select a testing location that offers the Safari browser as one of the options. Then you'll want to test multiple pages that represent the different primary templates and sections of your site. Do note though that even this will be using Safari on Windows, which was capped at version 5 back in 2012. So you can expect that current versions of Safari, especially native Mac apps, are likely faster.
Hope that sets your mind at ease, and gives you some next steps to further investigate alternative methods!
Paul
P.S When using GA page speed results, do note that by default Analytics only gathers data on 1% of page views. You need to customise your GA site snippet to push that level higher. This is critical for most sites because unless they have huge traffic volume, a 1% sample rate will be wildly inaccurate. The code snippet to add is
_gaq.push(['_setSiteSpeedSampleRate',100]);
and it has to go before the call to _trackPageview. By setting the sample rate to 100 as above, GA will try to track speed of all pageviews. It won't succeed of course, but you'll have far more reliable data. (GA will record speed data for a max of 10K hits per day)
-
Hi Dana,
I have done lots of work on site speed (a little obsessed with it but I have seen great results!) and I have made changes to a lot of sites that have massively improved load time and I have checked a couple and they are loading as quickly in Safari as the other browsers. I would be happy to give you some advice on possible quick fixes that you could make relatively easily and they will speed your site up significantly if you haven't already implemented them.
Drop me a pm with your site address and what server setup you are on Apache or IIS. I will have a look and see if there is any changes that may help
-
Hey Dana,
I've had this problem with Safari being slower as well. In fact, I just checked a handful of sites in Google Analytics and Safari is almost consistently the slowest browser. One question to look into is whether or not mobile traffic on Safari is slow. For the sites I'm looking at and for the sites I've worked on in the past, the culprit is usually Safari's desktop browser. Phones are usually within normal loading parameters (by phone standards).
Unfortunately, in most cases, the sluggish performance on Safari is due to Safari's DNS prefetching. Generally, prefetching does the opposite, but apparently can slow you down in Safari. You can read more about that here. http://macs.about.com/od/MacTroubleshootingTips/qt/Troubleshooting-Safari-Slow-Page-Loads-Caused-By-Dns-Prefetching.htm and this is another good one http://computers.tutsplus.com/tutorials/how-to-fix-slow-and-non-loading-webpages-in-safari--mac-51338 (Lots more if you Google Safari prefetching.)
I do think it is worth it to try to fix it. Here's what I would do, if I were you. Feel free to PM me if you want more help...
The way you fix this is on the client's machine, at least according to those articles (and others I've found while Google'ing around just now). However, you can try these steps out on your computer (if you've got a Mac) and see if you have an improved performance in Safari. It shouldn't take that long to test, and is probably worth it given the huge loss you are seeing due to this issue.
The next question is, well, how do I do this for everybody? The answer is to ask your visitors to use Chrome! No, seriously, one that worked for me in the past, was to detect the Safari user agent and load a slightly different version of the page that required fewer requests, meaning there will be less for Safari to prefetch. For instance, you might get rid of JavaScript, images, etc. that isn't essential. Obviously, keep the core content so that the pages are basically the same (kind of like you would for mobile detection).
This is obviously much more complicated to setup as it requires adjustments to the design as well as the code structure. But, generally simpler than trying to redo your entire website.
Before you make any such changes, it might be worth running a simple test on a key landing page that gets a lot of visits from Safari. Remove what elements you can for all user agents and see if this changes anything substantially with the site speed in Safari.
I hope that helps. Thanks,
Matthew
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Best to Include Phone Number as CTA Button in Mobile Version of B+B Web Site?
We are attempting to keep the number of CTAs (Calls to Action) on our commercial real estate website to a minimum. Our adjusted design (see attached) has 2 CTAs. One is "Contact Agent" the other is "Schedule a Tour". We are focusing on the listing page, which is the primary product page and critical in terms of CTA. Our mobile version does not show a phone number while the desktop version (also attached) displays a phone number. Should the mobile version also display a button a phone number? Some members of our target audiences, business owners and executives who are often in their 40s and 50s may prefer to call us up rather than communicate by written message. Any suggestions for elegantly displaying the phone number without causing confusion? I have read that the number of CTAs should be limited so I am on the fence as to whether or not to include a phone number Thanks,
Conversion Rate Optimization | | Kingalan1
Alan 6yR88Vt WwYpt810 -
We've a client that wants to repurpose some of the content on there site but not lose rankings. However its changing the content to an alternative to ....
The Current URL Example would be test.co.uk/prodcut-catogory/product-1 . This side of the business is being sold however they have products elsewhere in the range that can be used as alternatives to the product range that will be moved, so they want to amend these pages with an " alternative " slant. Example idea would be to change to the following : test.co.uk/prodcut-catogory/alternative-to-product-1, trying not to change the URL to much, keeping the majority of the content the same but adding new copy stating the benefits of using the alternative product. So it becomes a comparison between the two. I appreciate I will have to amend the URLs, titles, meta, H1s, add new copy & preform a 301's. Option 2 Simply write a second page which is all brand new content talking about it being an alternative to the products and doing a 301 from the original page but not amending that. Be great to get peoples feedback on this approach and if there is anything else that I could do to minimise the drop in rankings once I complete the changes. Thank you D
Conversion Rate Optimization | | SDOwner0 -
Adwords landing pages with no site links
Adwords best practices say to focus landing pages on conversions, with no navigational links to the rest of your website so they don't get distracted. However, now that Google Ads in the SERPs look so similar to organic results, visitors may click the ads instead of the organic result because that's what they see first. What is the risk of turning off these visitors who come to a landing page with a form, instead of a way to navigate through the rest of your site? Discussion question: Trade-offs between a form-focused landing page and providing navigation to the rest of the site?
Conversion Rate Optimization | | JannetteP1 -
Goal Tracking WIth Optimizely
Hi Guys, I am finally delving into the world of conversion rate optimization and split A/B Testing. It's all going well, have crazy egg for heatmapping (which is bringing up some interesting stuff) and I have decided to test some changes. I have setup a variation in optimizely, so i can see what effect the change would have, but i am struggling. I am trying to add the hellobar via crazy egg to a variation (it's just a simple piece of javascript), but when I do I get the following error "Error evaluating variation javascript:
Conversion Rate Optimization | | nezona
SyntaxError: expected expression, got '<' I thought optimizely was supposed to be easy to use!1 😞 Regards Neil0 -
Are website optimization and conversion rate optimization roughly the same thing?
This is mostly a semantics question, but I also want to check that I have a basic understanding of the two concepts. Are the two terms more or less interchangeable or are there any crucial differences? I always thought of website optimization as the complementary partner to SEO. While the ultimate goal of SEO is getting people TO your website, website optimization is focused on refining your website so that those people STAY on your website. When I think of conversion rate optimization, I'd imagine that's pretty much the same goal. Refining a website so that more people stay and ultimately convert (buy something, subscribe to a newsletter, etc). Is my understanding of one (or both) of them flawed, or is it six of one, half a dozen of the other? Thanks!
Conversion Rate Optimization | | BrianAlpert780 -
Brand Name: Conversion Rate Optimizing: Eponymous VS Generic
Good day all, We are entertaining the idea of changing the Domain Name & Brand Name for straplessfashion.com. While still in development, the website sells women undergarments. We did some survey research and it seems that women (age 18-40) really liked either "Demi's Dream" or "Almost Skin" as a good name. More specifically, Almost Skin seems to be the more popular choice over "Demi's Dream". I think "Almost Skin" catches attention quicker and may work best in PPC. However, when personalizing a brand name is considered, "Demi's Dream" might be the best choice. Would you please offer your advise on which of these two names might be the best for a new Domain and Brand name for the website mentioned above? Which would convert better? Thank you for your help. Carlos
Conversion Rate Optimization | | 90miLLA0 -
Where I can place a banner/message in my site telling I have a new website?
Where I should place a banner or a message in my old site to tell user that I have a new website? Thanks in advance!
Conversion Rate Optimization | | esiow20130 -
Question regarding eCommerce sites, relative URLs and secuirty certificates
We recently installed a new SSL certificate on an ecommerce site. Our IT Director is insisting that all pages on the site must be coded in such a way so that the address bar maintains a green background when a visitor is navigating the site after navigating to a secure page or logging in. I have worked on many ecommerce sites and never has this been an issue. Amazon does not use the green bar....but they are Amazon. In order for this to work, he is insisting that all internal URLs be coded as relative instead of absolute. How bad is this for SEO or does it really not matter that much? How crucial is it for trust and security? Opinions welcome!
Conversion Rate Optimization | | danatanseo0