Soliciting Product Reviews with Free Samples?
-
I have been looking at my competitors links and I have discovered that a competitor with top positions in the SERPs has been gaining links by offering free product samples to bloggers in exchange for links within the review back to their site.
My question is, does Google frown on this? Can it invoke a penalty? To me it seems tantamount to buying links, but yet his results speak for themselves. It is something I intend to start doing myself if I am sure it won't result in a penalty.
Thanks.
-
Hi,
Whether you report this or not is up to you - there's always been a lot of debate in SEO circles about whether it's a good idea to do this or not but the end of the story is pretty much that it's up to you.
The technical answer to the question is that yes, soliciting links with products is directly frowned upon. Plenty of people still basically do this but in a more subtle manner, where they are "developing a relationship" first, often not directly asking for a link. Products for publicity is an ancient trick which Google won't get rid of, but they definitely can and do say that they aren't happy with a direct exchange.
-
<this is="" a="" rant="" from="" blogger="" who="" gets="" solicited="" lot....="" maybe="" there="" nugget="" here="" to="" help="" you="" understand="" what="" some="" bloggers="" might="" think="" about="" these="" solicitations=""></this>
I have people wanting to send me free stuff to write a review for them.
They must think that I have nothing on the schedule here. Most bloggers who have any audience at all have a lot more interesting stuff to write about instead of your product. The things that I write about instead of your product are probably going to make me a lot more money. They are the topics that my readers want to hear about.
The largest group are people who want to send me a cheap product, expect me to try it and then shill it to the people who visit my site and subscribe to my feed. I am not going to be your mule. Honestly, if I filled my feed with a bunch of product reviews all of my visitors will stop visiting and all of my subscribers will unsubscribe.
Shilling your product is dangerous to my success.
So, I am not going to write about your product. If you want to reach my readers just buy adsense that is site targeted at my domain or ask about how much it costs to have the rectangle ad on the right side of all of my articles. It is going to cost a lot more than the product sample that you thought you would send me.
Any blogger who has a worthwhile audience is not going to write an article for your product sample. He isn't. The economics are not there. He is going to spend his time writing about the stuff that brings visitors to his site. Blathering about your product is not going to go down well with his visitors. He would be burning their patience.
Most bloggers with a worthwhile audience are just going to tell you.... Here are our advertising rates. You can have the rectangle on the right side of all of our article pages for $15,000 per month.
-
Agreed.
-
I find this one of google's many extremely vague guidelines that sounds clear, but in reality, is not at all. You can't exchange "a free product in exchange for them writing about it and including a link." Which, to me sounds like, "you can't give someone a sample and they agree to write about it and link to you." That parts clear. What's not clear, is whether or not you can send a blogger a free product, and hope they write about/link to it. If I had to argue it, I'd say you definitely can or google would have written differently to include the latter specifically.
Lots of bloggers are known for their reviews. It seems natural that they get sent products, especially new releases and review them in their blogs. If they only went out and reviewed the products they bought themselves, they probably wouldn't have a whole lot of content. So, sending them free products should be completely fine. The problem stems from what comes next.
1. How did you "discover" your competitor was doing this? (that's rhetorical) I just want to think about if how you discovered it and if it was something Google could discover itself. If it is, you definitely shouldn't do it.
2. Have you tried just sending out free samples to bloggers? If you're doing this primarily for SERPs, and not for the bloggers' fan base, then you don't need him/her to review 50 products to get you 50 links. Really, the first one (or few) are what provide you most of the SEO benefit. If you send someone twenty five free samples (with no strings attached), they probably will write about at least one (though, to be fair, I can't say for certain that's true). Also, you can look through the comments on the blogger's site, and find someone mentioning your product or something like your product, and then you could send your free sample with a screenshot of the comment. This would show that the blogger's community wants to know about your product, and you did some research.
3. If you're still going to do some sort of 'review my product for links" official deal, then I'd at least over send the blogger products and keep records of it. Maybe, if you get flagged by google, but you show only 4% of the products you sent out ever got reviewed, they might believe you were sending out samples legitimately...but I doubt it.
Good luck!
Ruben
-
I guess that would be your decision. I have in some instances reported violations, although they were not always heeded. If you wish to report them then here: https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/paidlinks?pli=1 is the best place to do so.
-
This begs the question, should i report my competitor who has achieved terrific results with this method?
-
Taken from: https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/66356?hl=en
The following are examples of link schemes which can negatively impact a site's ranking in search results:
- Buying or selling links that pass PageRank. This includes exchanging money for links, or posts that contain links; exchanging goods or services for links; or sending someone a “free” product in exchange for them writing about it and including a link
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Ecommerce sites we own have similar products, is this OK?
Hello, In one of our niches, we have a big site with all products and a couple more sites that are smaller niches of the same niche. The product descriptions are different with different product names. Is this OK. We've got one big site and 2 smaller subsides in different niches that cross over with the big site. Let me know if Google is OK with this. We will have a separate blog for each with completely different content. There's not really duplicate content issues and although only the big site has a blog right now, the small ones eventually will have their own unique blog. Is this OK in Google's eyes now and in the future? What can we do to ensure we are OK? Thank you.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | BobGW1 -
How does Google handle product detail page links hiden in a <noscript>tag?</noscript>
Hello, During my research of our website I uncovered that our visible links to our product detail pages (PDP) from grid/list view category-nav/search pages are <nofollowed>and being sent through a click tracking redirect with the (PDP) appended as a URL query string. But included with each PDP link is a <noscript>tag containing the actual PDP link. When I confronted our 3rd party e-commerce category-nav/search provider about this approach here is the response I recieved:</p> <p style="padding-left: 30px;">The purpose of these links is to firstly allow us to reliably log the click and then secondly redirect the visitor to the target PDP.<br /> In addition to the visible links there is also an "invisible link" inside the no script tag. The noscript tag prevents showing of the a tag by normal browsers but is found and executed by bots during crawling of the page.<br /> Here a link to a blog post where an SEO proved this year that the noscript tag is not ignored by bots: <a href="http://www.theseotailor.com.au/blog/hiding-keywords-noscript-seo-experiment/" target="_blank">http://www.theseotailor.com.au/blog/hiding-keywords-noscript-seo-experiment/<br /> </a> <br /> So the visible links are not obfuscating the PDP URL they have it encoded as it otherwise cannot be passed along as a URL query string. The plain PDP URL is part of the noscript tag ensuring discover-ability of PDPs by bots.</p> <p>Does anyone have anything in addition to this one blog post, to substantiate the claim that hiding our links in a <noscript> tag are in fact within the SEO Best Practice standards set by Google, Bing, etc...? </p> <p>Do you think that this method skirts the fine line of grey hat tactics? Will google/bing eventually penalize us for this?</p> <p>Does anyone have a better suggestion on how our 3rd party provider could track those clicks without using a URL redirect & hiding the actual PDP link?</p> <p>All insights are welcome...Thanks!</p> <p>Jordan K.</p></noscript></nofollowed>
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | eImprovement-SEO0 -
How does google know if rich snippet reviews are fake?
According to: https://developers.google.com/structured-data/rich-snippets/reviews - all someone has to do is add in some html code and write the review. How does google do any validation on whether these reviews are legitimate or not?
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | wlingke0 -
Product Review Permissions
Hello, In the past, a client has gotten a lot of emails from customers saying that they like specific products. Now he needs reviews. Can we use those old emails, with no name or maybe with initials as product reviews? We don't want to do anything unethical.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | BobGW0 -
Does having the same descrition for different products a bad thing the titles are all differnent but but they are the same product but with different designs on them does this count as duplicate content?
does having the same description for different products a bad thing the titles are all different but but they are the same product but with different designs on them does this count as duplicate content?
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | Casefun1 -
Check For Bad Directory Backlinks For Free
I used http://deletebacklinks.com/ yesterday to search 7 of the directories they have access to for searching bad links. I found one of my sites had links on these directories and I was able to remove them for fairly reasonable price. Thought this is a good tool to do a free quick check for any bad linkbacks on deindexed directories. I know this may be a small portion but every little bit helps.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | TheSEODR0 -
Secretly back-linking from whitelabel product
Lets say a company (provider.com) offers a whitelabel solution which enables each client to have all of the content on their own domain (product.client.com), with no branding by the content provider. Now lets say that client.com is a site with a lot of authority, and to promote the launch of product.client.com, they put a lot of links from their main site to the subdomain. This can be very valuable link juice, and provider.com would like to be able to take advantage. The problem is, that client.com wouldn't like it if provider.com put in links on their whitelabel site. Suppose the following: All pages on product.client.com start to have a rel="canonical" link to themselves, with a get variable (e.g. product.client.com/page.htm -> product.client.com/page.html?show_extra_link=true) When the page is visited with the extra get parameter "show_extra_link" a link appears in the footer that points to provider.com My question is, would this have the same effect for provider.com as placing a link on the non-canonical version of the pages on the whitelabel site would?
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | seoczar0 -
Same template site same products but different content?
for the sake of this post I am selling lighters. I have 3 domains small-lighters.com medium-lighter.com large-lighters.com On all of the websites I have the same template same images etc and same products. The only difference is the way the content is worded described etc different bullet points. My domains are all strong keyword domains not spammy and bring in type in traffic. Is it ok to continue in this manner in your opinion?
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | dynamic080