Outbound links
-
Hi everyone,
Just a quick question about using info/statistics from other sources in my articles.
If I use a quote/piece of info from another online article do I just say where it's from and link to it? Is this acceptable or do you have to get permission? I find the whole permissions thing quite confusing! I know that outbound links are good for SEO so just wanted to check this.
Thanks!
-
Thanks, EGOL!
You've been very helpful!
-
If they are taking your original content it can be illegal if...
-
they do not have a case for fair use
-
you have not done something to make your content available for other use (such as make it public domain, creative commons, etc.)
Copyright infringement is covered by Federal statute in the United States. If your content is registered you might have a case to sue, even if no financial damage is suffered. It can be considered criminal if the infringer is knowing and willful.
I am not an attorney. I recommend consulting with one if you have copyright problems.
I have done my due diligence and regularly file DMCA's, send informal take down notices, and have my attorney handle situations that might be complex or are against an infringer of note.
-
-
Thank you for your fast response!
Is it actually illegal to do so or is it just frowned upon? I actually compete against some of these sites and it's not just one or two articles, it's the ENTIRE blog (30+ articles).
-
Verbatim articles on a website can often outrank the original source, especially if the original source website is not very strong.
If they do it with my content, I will probably file a DMCA with Google and perhaps with their host.
-
Hello, EGOL.
I like your detailed answer here! I have seen some blogs copy other entire articles (verbatim, images and all) and then just source the original blog link at the bottom of the article. Unfortunately, these sites rank very well for not doing any REAL work.
Is this something that will eventually come back to bite them or are they just going to get away with it forever? Your expertise is very much appreciated!
Thank you!
-
EGOL - thanks so much for this answer. You have really explained this well and put my mind at rest! I will check out the wiki article.
Thanks again.
-
Here is how many people handle these...
If you write your own sentence that incorporates a statistic or a fact that is not original to you, then it is proper to attribute that information to your source. This is usually done in footnote fashion similar to what you see in Wikipedia articles.
This wikipedia article on "citation" is a good place to see examples of how to dot it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citation
Permission is not required if the work is publicly available on a website or in a published book, unless you have agreed to confidentiality of the informaiton. Just use a footnote and a link to their website or a reference to a printed document. Instead of a link you can give the full url if you don't want to use a hyperlink.
If you are going to quote verbatim a sentence or two, but not more than that, then placing that verbatim text in
is often done. This indents the text, separating it from your own, with a footnote number in brackets at the end. [2] Permission is not needed for a short quote from a book or from a website (unless there is a confidentiality agreement). Just make it clear that you have quoted and keep the length of your quote very short - a sentence or two at most. Many people will also place the
text in italics to really make it clear that you have cited.
How many times can you do this in an article? If you do it once with a sentence or two it should be fine. But if you are going to do it multiple times you could run into an infringement problem. How many times? I would get permission if I was going to use multiple blockquotes from a single source.
If you have any doubts about using the text of others in references or quotes, then it is best to consult an attorney about the "fair use" part of copyright law. I am not an attorney and can't give exact answers on this. In fact, many attorneys will tell you that they can't give exact answers because copyright problems often need to be tested in court in front of a jury. It is hard or impossible what a jury will return in many situations.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
When using external links for onsite optimization, should they be follow or nofollow links?
I'm trying to optimize my home page and need to add external links. I'm planning to link to other authoritative sites. Should they be follow or no follow links?
On-Page Optimization | | ntaparia171 -
Should I nofollow certain outbound links?
Hi, All of our outbound links are currently follow.I've read that the only case where nofollow should be used, according to Google, is for paid links, crawl prioritization & untrustworthy sites.The kinds of websites we are linking to from our blog include:- Websites with great content & high authority that is relevant to the topic we've written about that would enhance the user experience- Partners/companies we have a strong relationship with who also have decent authority- Social media profiles of industry people not within our organisation - Websites with definitions/wikipedia/soundcloud/published statistics/news sites and other large well known sites. I am wondering if we should put the nofollow attribute on the last 2 points (social media profiles of people we've referenced, websites with definitions/wikipedia/soundcloud/published statistics/news sites and other large well known sites.)Or do you think it's totally fine that all our links are follow provided the websites are legitimate, trustworthy and have some authority?Thanks in advance!
On-Page Optimization | | PGAUE0 -
Google Webmaster Guideline Change: Human-Readable list of links
In the revised webmaster guidelines, google says "[...] Provide a sitemap file with links that point to the important pages on your site. Also provide a page with a human-readable list of links to these pages (sometimes called a site index or site map page)." (Source: https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/35769?hl=en) I guess what they mean by this is something like this: http://www.ziolko.de/sitemap.html Still, I wonder why they say that. Just to ensure that every page on a site is linked and consequently findable by humans (and crawlers - but isn't the XML sitemap for those and gives even better information)? Should not a good navigation already lead to every page? What is the benefit of a link-list-page, assuming you have an XML sitemap? For a big site, a link-list is bound to look somewhat cluttered and its usefulness is outclassed by a good navigation, which I assume as a given. Or isn't it? TL;DR: Can anybody tell me what exactly is the benefit of a human-readable list of all links? Regards, Nico
On-Page Optimization | | netzkern_AG0 -
Can we use internal no-follow links without negatively affecting rankings
we are creating a site structure for a travel website. the site homepage has a top navigation bar with 8 top level links and a total link count of 33 links in this (within menus). There are also 10 footer and ad-hoc links As this top navigation bar is a site-wide navigation, when entering s specific "travel destination" page, the "travel destination" page has its own contextual links and reference links, making the total inks on the destination page approx 107. do you think its ok to make all links in the top navigation bar no follow on all pages except the homepage? how would you approach this to create less links to maintain effective link-juice flow to required pages
On-Page Optimization | | Direct_Ram0 -
23000 Links are not found- Should I redirect them?
Hi I have been deleting product links from my website but never redirect them. On my google webmaster, it shows there is total 23000 products are not found. Should I redirect them all back to the home page? For the pages with soft 404 response.. should I also redirect those original URL back to home page ? Thanks
On-Page Optimization | | ilovebodykits0 -
Are My footer links bad?
I started working here recently, they said the footer links were to help with navigation of their most popular products. I am curious after reading http://www.seomoz.org/blog/internal-linking-strategies-for-2012-and-beyond if having these footer links could hurt the ranking of those key words after the penguin update. I am looking more into the analytics, and have not seen a negative impact yet.
On-Page Optimization | | DoRM0 -
Why does the on page report reports a full path link as Cannibalize link?
On the seomoz on page report i get a cannibalize error. This is due to a link being full path. When i change the link to relative path then there is no Cannibalize error. Should i change the internal links of the site to relative path? I would appreciate your help.
On-Page Optimization | | pickaweb0 -
Prevent link juice to flow on low-value pages
Hello there! Most of the websites have links to low-value pages in their main navigation (header or footer)... thus, available through every other pages. I especially think about "Conditions of Use" or "Privacy Notice" pages, which have no value for SEO. What I would like, is to prevent link juice to flow into those pages... but still keep the links for visitors. What is the best way to achieve this? Put a rel="nofollow" attribute on those links? Put a "robots" meta tag containing "noindex,nofollow" on those pages? Put a "Disallow" for those pages in a "robots.txt" file? Use efficient Javascript links? (that crawlers won't be able to follow)
On-Page Optimization | | jonigunneweg0