I tried SEMRUSH and they are a great tool, but's very limited for the free version.
Posts made by ACann
-
RE: Free Tool that allows you to compare traffic for multiple websites
-
RE: Is there a tool on Moz or out on the internet that does bad link checker
Thanks guys,
I see there isn't an all in one / magic pill tool to use.
Regards,
Benny
-
RE: Free Tool that allows you to compare traffic for multiple websites
I've tried that. They will only allow you to compare 2 sites at once.
-
Free Tool that allows you to compare traffic for multiple websites
I'm banging my head on this one. In the past I was able to use Compete.com, Quancast, Google Trends, and Alexa, but now all these sites either required you to have Pro membership (pay) or they discontinue it like Google Trends for website.
I need to do this comparison for one of my client... their traffic versus 4 of their competitors.
Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
Have a blessed Day,
Benny
-
Is there a tool on Moz or out on the internet that does bad link checker
I'm still pretty new to this and I was wondering if there is a free software, one of Moz or free out on the the internet that allows you to check bad links. I've done a lot of link building with citations and directories that for my clients industry. I just don't want to add their website and profile to a bad/risky directory and it penalizes my clients. I've seen a few out there, but I need one that is respectable and reliable. Any suggestions? I found one called bad neighborhood http://www.bad-neighborhood.com/text-link-tool.htm.
Thanks Again,
Benny
-
RE: Disabling a slider with content...is considered cloaking?
Yes, I just disabled the javascript. The slider was a big part of the design.
-
Disabling a slider with content...is considered cloaking?
We have a slider on our site www.cannontrading.com, but the owner didn't like it, so I disabled it. And, each slider contains link & content as well. We had another SEO guy tell me it considered cloaking. Is this True? Please give feedbacks.
-
RE: Has anyone else experience their Domain Authority Drop in the last 2 weeks to their sites
Thanks for the quick response. Glad that it wasn't something I did.
-
Has anyone else experience their Domain Authority Drop in the last 2 weeks to their sites
Has anyone else experienced their Domain Authority Score Drop in the last 2 weeks. I have 6 sites and all of their DA dropped between 2-4 points. At the beginning I thought it was just my Wordpress sites, but it happened to all my sites. If anyone has any answers, please enlighten me. Is it Google? Last time this happened was in March 2013 and raised all the scores back up and now as of lately, they all have dropped.
Kin Regards,
David
-
RE: I need help with a PHP canonical URL tags
Thanks Shane,
That was very simple and to the point. I am doing SEO on a php site where there's a header and a footer and I didin't know how to add the canoical tag to the header correctly and the On page. Thanks again.
Benny
-
RE: What could cause your Domain Authority score to drop?
If we had a company doing articles submissions and they stop doing it, would this affect DA score and the keyword rankings? Like I said, I haven't changed anything to the site except taking 50 unranked keywords from t he campaign and adding it to our other two websites campaign.
-
What could cause your Domain Authority score to drop?
We have 3 websites that are on 3 different campaigns. Our flagship website is www.cannontrading.com. The Domain Authority score on it was 42. When I first (Mid November 2012) started, we had 295 keywords allocated for Cannontrading.com and 5 other keywords for allocated to our other websites... e-futures.com and e-mini.com. What I wanted to do was optimize the other two pages and I did this by taking taking 50 the keywords that were not ranked in the top 50 from Cannontrading.com and assigned them to the our other two sites. Could this have caused the drastic drop in the score? Our keyword rankings for the "Top 3" has dropped from 93 to 34 since November 2012.
We did have a company that did article submissions for us up till October 2012. Could this have caused our drop in the Domain Authority Score and our Keyword Rankings?
I didn't make any other changes to Cannon website beside taking away those keywords and given them to our other sites.
Any suggestions or thoughts would really help me.
Regards,
David
-
RE: Is this a possible Google penalty scenario?
Yeah! That was actually the first time I had even heard of Yandex. Of course the issue is that I haven't searched in the Russian version of our keyword using the .ru SE as I'm not sure about any linguistic differences that Google Translate wouldn't account for (it's a financial industry term).
I'm sure we're not ranked highly in the Russian version of the SE though, as we don't have a Russian version of the site! haha
-
RE: Is this a possible Google penalty scenario?
You're definitely right about the discrepancies, I pay so much attention to Google that I had forgotten the other SE's show large discrepancies for many of our key phrases/terms.
My thought on the penalty for a certain phrase was that it had to do with the search volume of that phrase, but that's just speculation. I suppose only time and further SEO work will tell.
-
RE: Is this a possible Google penalty scenario?
When did Google state they didn't penalize your site in rankings? I thought that's been a trend for years now when you broke the webmaster guidelines in a way that wasn't strong enough to be banned but strong enough to warrant penalty.
Sharing the URL of websites I work on seems like a bad idea to me, so I'll keep it to myself for now. The keyword is "highly competitive" 53%, as determined by SEOMoz's tool and our page has been optimized for this keyword for 5+ years now - hence why we were on page 1 from before 2005 - 2011.
Only once we were banned from Google were we unable to move above the first spot on Page 3, despite regaining #3 rankings in Yahoo and Bing. I don't usually see that large of discrepancies between the SE's, am I wrong?
My one thought is that this also coincides with the release of Panda, though our site has no duplicate content issues.
-
Is this a possible Google penalty scenario?
In January we were banned from Google due to duplicate websites because of a server configuration error by our previous webmaster. Around 100 of our previously inactive domain names were defaulted to the directory of our company website during a server migration, thus showing the exact same site 100 times... obviously Google was not game and banned us.
At the end of February we were allowed back into the SERPS after fixing the issue and have since steadily regained long-tail keyword phrase rankings, but in Google are still missing our main keyword phrase. This keyword phrase brings in the bulk of our best traffic, so obviously it's an issue.
We've been unable to get above position 21 for this keyword, but in Yahoo, Bing, and Yandex (Russian SE) we're positions 3, 3, and 7 respectively. It seems to me there has to be a penalty in effect, as this keyword gets between 10 and 100 times as much traffic in Google than any of the ones we're ranked for, what do you think?
EDIT: I should mention in the 4-5 years prior to the banning we had been ranked between 15 and 4th in Google, 80% of the time on the first page.
-
RE: Will you be adding +1 to your sites?
You really think Google will close out my Gmail and Google Docs account because I used their plus one service too much? Yeah... okay, let me know how you think they will actually implement that.
Headline: "Google closes email accounts because users did too many +1's"
or even, more realistically IMO,
Headline: "Google bans people from +1 for using it too much"
Really? I don't see that as a viable route for them. They're much more likely to just not use spammy +1s in determining SERPS - behind the scenes.
-
RE: Will you be adding +1 to your sites?
What is "unknown" though? With Twitter you have followers to easily distinguish who's putting out valuable stuff, but with Google all I have is my Gmail and Google Docs.
Of course I know there's also some type of networking possible on Google, but if they only go by the people who actually use that then the plus one affecting SERPS is a moot point anyway, as the majority of users sign up with Google for a particular service, largely Gmail or Docs.
I do agree plus one-ing 100 sites in an hour is obviously abnormal, but how about 20 within an hour? I could easily hit that in a browsing session.
P.S. as a side note - "plus one-ing" what the heck? They couldn't come up with a better action?
-
RE: Will you be adding +1 to your sites?
What I've been wondering about is the potential for blackhat abuse. I have several Google accounts under slightly different names that I use for different purposes, and I have plenty of friends who I'll be encouraging to "+1" my site's homepage, so what's stopping somebody from bringing this to an even bigger level?
An enterprising individual could start a nice business connecting websites willing to pay for +1's. I would absolutely pay $1 for a plus one, and I would even more absolutely be willing to plus one 100 websites for $100. If I didn't have a conscience (and if I had time) I would be all over this!
-
RE: Should we change our site domain name to include our keyword?
I tend to agree that you can't take everything Google says at face value, at the end of the day they're still a company and have their own interests to defend.
You indeed could develop several other KW-specific domains (assuming you had the domain names), but I think the big reason not to is that it would take a lot of time and money to get peripheral sites to the point where they compete with 12 year old domains with thousands of quality links. IMO this time is better spent on your own site on something other than SEO - like marketing, which has its own SEO benefits.
-
RE: Widgetbox.com Widgets - SEO Tomfoolery?
I'd like to bump this and mention that the widgets are actually included on the page as an iframe when javascript is enabled... again, any thoughts on the SEO validity of viral widgets? Disregarding any marketing/ brand awareness benefits.
-
Widgetbox.com Widgets - SEO Tomfoolery?
We recently revived a slew of industry-specific widgets that we had created on Widgetbox.com largely for SEO purposes. The widget is remote-hosted and just a static HTML cache page showing information, so all Widgetbox does is wrap that HTML page in javascript to show it.
However, I realized that when Javascript is disabled there's no link back to our website, just 4 or 5 back to Widgetbox. When Javascript is enabled we have a simple link back to our website at the bottom of the widget.
I know Google has the ability to crawl Javascript now, but what do you think about this, will these links count? I could find virtually 0 information about it elsewhere. I'm thinking I may just add several widgets to another website to see if Google picks up the links.
-
RE: Should we change our site domain name to include our keyword?
I think you're right that the cost would outweigh the benefit, and I'm going to focus instead on marketing & some juicy link bait.
-
RE: Should we change our site domain name to include our keyword?
Thank you for the responses! First, it seems some people missed my point that "math problems" and "rocketmathproblems.com" is an example to illustrate our situation. If you would like to take a look at the actual domain and the keyword phrase we're targeting let me know and I'll send it to you in a PM.
saibose - this seems to be a very good reason not to change it. However, the variety of pages in the top 10 results, from PR 2 with less than 100 domains linking in, to PR 9 with thousands of domains linking in, makes me think that the domain name still carries significant weight.
Dunamis - those sites are pretty extreme examples. Instead, look at a real Google search using my example: "math problems". These ratios are almost exact replicas of my actual keyword phrase results.
9/10 have the most important keyword, "math" in the URL.
3/10 have the full phrase, "math problems" in the URL.
Keeping with my example of "Rocketproblems.com", right now my website does not have the important keyword "math" in it.
I suppose the biggest reason for me not to make the switch is because of losing link value in the 301 redirect. Again, if anybody would like to actually look at the home page's SEO or the website and keywords just say so and I'll send you the domain name.
EDIT: About the SEO strength of the page:
SEOMoz On-Page Report Card: A
Page Authority: 52
Domain Authority: 42
I do agree that more links will help, but I need to decide if changing the URL will also make a sizeable difference (+5 spots would be worthwhile).
-
RE: Should we change our site domain name to include our keyword?
I'd really like to emphasize the incredible value of the exact keyword phrase "math problems". Even if we were on page 1 for this keyword, but didn't show up for nearly any other phrase aside from our domain name, it would be fantastic.
Currently we're ranked #22, it looks like the highest we've been is #10. This phrase is definitely a niche, but not proprietary. Another close example is "PHP programming", which is even close in search volume according to Google Trends. In my example would it be worth switching from "www.RocketProgramming" to "www.Rocket-php-programming"? (included dashes because it was too verbose.. our scenario wouldn't be that bad.).
-
Should we change our site domain name to include our keyword?
Our niche has one keyword phrase that is much, much more active than any other comparable phrase. Let's call that phrase "math problems". Within this phrase, the "math" is absolutely the most important keyword, as it is also used in every spin-off search phrase, like "math answers", "math practice", etc.
We've had our domain since 1996, and is currently the company name - "Rocketproblems.com". Over the last year (2010-2011) our SERPs have steadily dropped to the point where we're not getting a sustainable level of business from organic search, whereas in 2009 we were doing fantastic.
However, we've also had "Rocketmathproblems.com" since about 2000, just gathering dust. What I've noticed from the top search results is that nearly every domain has either "math" or "math problems" in its URL.
Do you think it's worth it to switch to the keyword-rich URL? It is a bit more verbose, and the "Rocketmathproblems.com" v.s. "Rocketproblems.com" example perfectly captures the different feeling. My inclination is that SEO is only becoming more competitive, and if we aren't getting worthwhile business from organic search at the moment then we should bite the bullet and make the switch for the future, along with ramping up our content generation. However, I also noticed that in late 2009 a previous webmaster switched to "Rogermath.com" but switched back within a month when our SERP for the key phrase was a page lower - I gleaned this from a Moz Juicy Keywords Report :). Thoughts?