Welcome to the Q&A Forum
Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.
After going back to your campaign dashboard, does the campaign shows up there?
If not, you can do 2 things:
Set he new campaign up in PRO (in Analytics you can switch to PRO), and then contact contact [email protected] to look into it.
Hope that helps!
Google probably does what the nofollow tag says.
Still... think positive: you got a mention on "examiner"!, probably will drive you some nice organic traffic...
(my inner jealous talking: I'd kill for one! even knowing they are nofollow :P)
I agree, it doesn't make any sense. I would redirect everything instead to a subfolder:
Hi Steve,
I just posted a response to a similar question here.
However, if the content you present in the same exact page changes based on the user location, I would personally suggest you create separate pages to serve to specific locations and implement rel="alternate" hreflang="x" tags. You can read more on that here: https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/189077?hl=en
Hope that helps!
Unfortunately, as this point, I think Moz isn't capable of doing that, although it would be a nice feature, however, Moz would still need to crawl the entire site to find the URLs that matching the URLs that match your wildcard settings, ending up in the entire site being crawled.
I am guessing you use some kind of CMS for those pages, maybe wordpress, then you can change the URL structure to be something like domain.com/blog/* and then create a campaign for domain.com/blog.
Anyways, you can contact moz at [email protected] asking if they are planning to add such a feature.
(I run a test prior to this response to see if that worked, it didn't.)
That coming from you is just enough for the day 
I don't know who you are or what you do, but reading your responses I never, and I mean NEVER have something to add. It's like reading from wikipedia... lol
If only I knew who you are Egol...
As Tim pointed, it is a common practice on examiner to nofollow their outbound links.
I personally found that disgusting... (regardless the site doing it) they are "profiting" with what you wrote while not giving you any credit. Yeah, I also get the point of being featured on their site, organic link traffic, etc. but still, they are quoting me, naturally, why not linking naturally too.
My quick guess, is that they do so many product reviews, they are just covering their a***s against any advertorial accusation that could led to a penalty...
A few Webmaster videos ago, Google's Matt Cutts pointed out that that Googlebot should be treated exactly the same as if it was a regular person visiting your site, which you are currently doing.
However, you are now FORCING users to stay on "their" corresponding location, instead you should "suggest" but not force it.
Example: user access the naked domain: domain.com then you check his/her IP and redirect the the appropriate location, you must in this case, use some kind of "we already redirected him/her" method to avoid forcing the user to a specific country subdomain, you can use either sessions or cookies. Once you redirect, you create a cookie saving the option or a session variable. You now have the visitor in the location you want and you should offer an easy way to switch the location (check live examples, like logitech.com), a drop down menu for example on the footer. Now, IF a user accesses a location, say au.domain.com, you shouldn't do the automatic redirection, but instead, you could bring a lightbox pop-up suggesting the user to go to their "best match" location.
Using the above method allows Google to access any page, without forcing it to a specific location, plus, from my point of view, it is the easier and friendlier way for users too. If I type au.domain.com (while in the US) I probably want to see the AU version, if not, the page will suggest me to switch (and based on my response (closing the window or clicking a "stay here") the site should remember it and avoid re-asking).
Hope that helps!
Then you don't have nothing to do, nothing to noindex, as actually there are no extra pages. Is just one script that includes extra scripts "behind the scenes".
Hi, can you please tell us your URL so we can look closer?
It appears to be the plugin you are using, probably you need to fix some parts of the code, I'm shooting to guess here... but you can probably set some redirect rules before the wordpress's rules to manage the old pages and then remove the plugin, which is causing the 404s on the 404s.
Hope that helps.
Daniel,
Unfortunately, there isn't any tool that can tell you if you received an algo "penalty". The only way to know is looking at your organic traffic, if you see some drop from one day to another then you probably did. In any case, algo penalties are applied and removed in the same way, just fix what you think caused the issue and then wait
How are the pages in the tabs being loaded? iframes? Ajax? In both cases, they shouldn't be noindexed if they offer valuable content that can't be accessed from another page.
You can redirect the site safely as long as site B doesn't have any algorithm or manual penalty applied, if it does, redirecting the site will actually redirect the penalty too.
If you are sure you don't have any penalty, then you can apply a 301 to site A and also notify Google of the URL change.
As for the first question, if the content is exactly the same then any of the two could be suffering an algo penalty, in that case, a 301 should "remove" the penalty as the content is no longer duplicate on 2 different sites, but published only in 1.
Restaurant names/brand names are different? If that's the case I'd suggest you stick with one Website for each one of them and if you'd like you can link them together with a nofollow link.
From an SEO perspective, you can get more authority if you use a single domain for both, but if I look it from the user point of view, 2 sites seems much more appropriate, and Google says every day: think, and build to users.
It is ultimately your choice, those are just my 2 cents
That should be an easy fix for your programmer. If your internal links point to pages with uppercase letters in them, then have the canonical tags with the uppercase. Almost always, uppercase and lowercase loads the same content as the rewrite rules use the URL to look on the products using a DB that does not distinguish uppercase & lowercase automatically (in MySQL, you can force the query to do so, but that will be actually more difficult to just change the way the programmed made the canonical tags). You should also redirect the pages that are duplicate to the original ones, if they have uppercase letters (the original) then the lowercase version should redirect to the uppercase one (once the canonical tags are properly set).
From MY OWN PERSONAL point of view, I always preferred lowercase URLs... if that's the case there's a little more coding to do, but you will end up with all URLs in lowercase (for some reason almost all CMS automatically convert uppercase letters to lowercase in a page URL, like Wordpress does).
Hope that helps!
Did you check if those pages actually return a 404 error?
How many static pages do you have excluding the blog? (and by static on also mean VERY different one to another).
There are several services that migrate HTML sites to wordpress and their prices depend on the site size. You only need to consider the static pages (that have completely different design) and the basic blog pages (blog listing, author, archive and the single post pages). Once you have the exact amount of pages you need you can ask for quotes on those sites specialized on doing this kind of work.
Hi Papp,
What you are asking is the million dollar question... there's no right answer. To get traffic you need basically 2 things:
A great Website. And excellent content (whatever the niche is, it could also be the "best products" if you were selling something, or the "best service").
The real question here is: do your websites have what they need to rank in the SERPs? I'm quite sure, that 10 - 30 "seo'ed" articles are not even near enough unless those articles that you published are something really extraordinary that you can't find anywhere else, say a medical research for example.
My advice? Take one of the sites first, and try to do something amazing. If you are able to monetize that first one with AdSense, then you would have learned what is needed to do it with the other sites.
How long have you waited since you applied all the rules to avoid duplicate content, as if it was just recently, then Google should be "rebuilding" the index of your site and stats may be a little crazy while that is happening.
If it was over 2 month ago and you are seeing the increase now, then I'd suggest you revise the rules you created to see if your own Website isn't creating all those new pages.
Hope that helps.
Report the results to Google, not that they will actually care, but if you open a thread in the Webmaster Help Forums, someone from Google may see the thread and tell you what's going on.
Anyway, that's completely normal and I see that in every possible niche. Bad sites being ranked above good ones, they are just "awaiting" a drop, it will come, the question is when...
Try to get in touch with someone at google, tweet Cutts, open a thread in WHF, write about it, get the word out. If you really deserve a better spot then all that may get Google's attention.
I think the best structure would be the easier to read:
I'd personally use example.com/clothing -> example.com/dresses -> example.com/dresses-kelly-maxi (but this actually something you decide.. there's no golden rule to follow. If the content is good you can even have example.com?cat_id=5 and rank perfectly well).
In this case, there's no need to repeat "clothing" it is already understood when you say "dresses".
As for the filters, the best way is to use URL parameters, following the example above: example.com/dresses-kelly-maxi?sort-by=price&order=desc
Any possible combination of the filter should point to the page where all the options are listed "naturally". If by default example.com/dresses-kelly-maxi is sorted by date added, then the canonicals on any possible filter you offer should point to that page.
Hope that helps!
The stats in the page are from 2013, if you are going to present stats for 2014, then create a new page. You only need to update when the content becomes irrelevant, but for those stats, they will still be relevant in 10 years, they are "stats from 2013".
Hope that helps.
Every time you make a redirect, 301, some of the pagerank is diluted. So following your example, from going from A to C you should redirect both A and B to C, not A -> B -> C as you double the loss.
Redirects are just fine, and in my opinion, they should say for as long as the pages being redirected still get organic traffic (backlinks, search, etc.). The moment you see no more traffic, and the links pointing to that redirected page fixed (point to the new page) you can safely remove the redirection. For as on the amount of redirects, it won't be a problem if you have lots of them, unless you do multiple redirects from A to G going from one page to the other until reaching the final, working version.
If that's not your scenario and A redirects directly to G, then you are fine. Monitor traffic on A and see if at some point you can remove the redirection, otherwise just leave is there (I personally have redirects that have been there for over 3 years as the pages are still getting organic traffic (mainly from links).
Hope that helps! And a happy new year to you too!
I'd suggest you nofollow all those links. You say "which don’t really fit the mold for “excessive link exchanging.”" but you are forgetting that each page will contain the same link, therefore creating god knows how many backlinks from ALL the pages in your site to the other sites, and the same for all the others.
As an example, I had a manual link penalty applied, and when applying for a reconsideration, which was declined, the example links given by Google included a link to my business site from MY OWN personal site, something that said "I am the Owner of X" being X the link, and THAT link was one of the 3 examples in the negatory.
So again, I'd suggest you nofollow all those links, and actually only doing it if the sites are really related to one another. Read the article about something that Amazon is doing and EVERYONE thinks they should be penalized for: http://www.seroundtable.com/amazon-footer-links-spam-17857.html
Hope that helps!
My 2 cents:
Nothing to worry about. You won't repeat the word on EVERY page on your site. You are just doing it in the homepage. Plus, using the brand in all the other pages, will give Google (and others) a clue about the brand name:
Index: NLP Training and Certification Center | NLP and Coaching Institute
2nd Page: 2nd page | NLP and Coaching Institute
etc.Hope that helps.
There are over 200 factors Google considers to rank sites. I've seen sites that are just published being ranked above sites with over 7 or more years in business. It all changes and their algorithm is always trying to guess what is the visitor looking for.
In my niche, there are 2 sites above me, ranked 2nd and 3rd, with no authority, no backlinks, no content, not a good design/page/service, etc, still they are STILL there.
The data Moz shows can give you a CLUE on how is your site performing, but it will be even better if you see their data as trends. For example, you start to create new content daily, GOOD, interesting content, you then see a boost in your rankings, still not getting the place you think you deserve, don't worry, that trend shows you that creating content is working, keep doing it.
You can also ask for some help in the Google Webmaster Forums, the guys there are usually rude, but almost always right
Hope that helps.
I'd suggest you create only one Google+ Page focused on your brand. You can then add the G+ page batch on all subdomains if you want, as maintaining multiple G+ pages could be a little difficult, not to mention you will get more traction promoting your brand.
Moz does it for you if you have a PRO+ account
Anyway, the thing here is that archive, tag and author pages (pagination) do not provide ANY value to the user or Google itself, therefore it should be better no noindex while leaving the follow tag to let the pagerank flow to the pages that DO matter: POSTS.
That could be a problem, yes. static.domain.com is another domain that www.domain.com and therefore the sitemap should be in www.domain.com for URLs on www.domain.com.
I've seen image sitemaps in www.domain.com where all the images are on a subdomain, like static.domain.com and that wasn't an issue, but personally I'd suggest you put the sitemap in the www.domain.com.
There's another service, provided by McAfee that scans your site for possible vulnerabilities and even provides with a bath ONLY if your site is proven to be safe and you fix any issue they can find. Can't remember the price though, but I used it in the past and they scan the entire site daily, totally recommended.
Yes, google crawls and understands almost every language, so you shouldn't have any problem.
Make sure you add the appropriate (changing "es" for whatever language you will use).
Subdomains are basically different domains, so if your competitor does it a lot, and they interlink all those pages, they could even get a penalty.
If you use subfolders, all the link juice you get to any page will affect the entire site, as opposed to subdomains, where each backlink affects the subdomain itself, and therefore the main domain gets less juice.
Both are possible and accepted, but if you ask me, I would go with the sub-folders instead.
Hi,
Hope that helps!
Hi Ruben
I checked your page and it works well with both my useragent and googlebot's which in result it shouldn't show an error when you manually fetch it. That should be some kind of Google glitch and you can probably ask for help in the Webmaster Help forums.
As for Google fetching not existent pages, that completely normal. The most common reason is that someone linked to the page and instead wrote the URL wrong. Check in the report, click on the URL, and see form where it is linked from. You can also find that there's no page linking to that non-existent page, but still Google tries to fetch it anyways, that has been widely known as Google trying to "guess" URLs that are actually not listed anywhere.
Hope that helps!
Happy holidays!
Hi,
Would you mind sharing the URL?
Thanks!
Merry Christmas!
Hi Edmond,
First, I'd suggest you to re-upload all your files.
Then you can do some damage assessment and find out where is the hack and how they went through.
Let's start with that, re-upaload.
If your site uses a CMS, you should update the CMS right away, if it is wordpress, I'd also suggest to use a service like CloudFlare with a PRO account and make use of the WAF (web application firewall) to help prevent another infection while you are still fixing things. WAF offers dozens of fixes to wordpress loopholes that an attacker may use to gain access.
If your site doesn't use a CMS, you need to find out how they accessed your site, usual causes are mysql injection or a brute force attack to get FTP/DB access.
A Plus - Google Webmaster Help on Hacked sites:
The "idea" is still valid. You need a "Thank You" page that actually sends the transaction details to Analytics. Users must be redirected to that page after completing the payment, and I guess the return URL is just a variable you set while sending the order details to Worldpay (look into their docs for that: return url).
Then, in the "thank you" page you trace the order and create the analytics ecommerce call (with any programing language) depending on the version of Analytics you are using, it could be the ga (ga('require','ecommerce','ecommerce.js'); and then the rest of the transaction details) or the older _TrackTrans() (after the rest of the transaction details).
Hope that helps!
Mind sharing the URL of any of your articles to see if the markup is there?
Glad it helped. Feel free to mark the question as answered if you are satisfied with the response.
Have a good one!
Can't see the image.
Please use imgurl as suggested by Moz.
Did you receive any manual penalty? (check in GWT).
Unfortunately you can't. Google announced a reduction on authorship snippets in search results a while ago, most likely to stop the abuse of authorship. Instead, they now only display the snippet once the author gains certain "level", or better said "trusted authors".
There's no fix you can do, however, you can regain your authorship by creating great content, publishing articles and interacting socially.
You can read more about the reduction on the authorship snippets here: http://www.seroundtable.com/google-authorship-dropping-17840.html
Hope that helps!
If you just do a 301 of the entire domain then you are completely safe.
However, if you decide to go another route and build a landing page, specifically designed to target those keywords then the page will be penalized as a backdoor page + it could take a hit on EMD too.
For example, take a big brand: Apple.
www.itunes.com -> http://www.apple.com/itunes/
www.iphone.com -> http://www.apple.com/iphone/
All redirect to their main domain: apple.com
*It must be a 301 redirect of the entire domain. Which then gives me the following question: keyword reach domains aren't worth it, branded domains are. You don't see www.cellphone.com redirecting to apple or any other cell phone brand page, instead, they get their branded domains, in this example: iphone.com, itunes.com, mac.com, ipad.com, etc. People isn't going to look for a keyword reach domain, instead if they enter in their address bar "green apple" their browser will perform a search for those keywords on Google, Bing or whatever browser they have, which will NOT return your keyword reach domain as it is actually nor indexed by Google as it is just a redirection.
To sum up, branded domains = Perfect. Keyword rich domains = spending money.
Took a quick look at your site. Those affiliate links are nofollow, so you are safe on that matter.
You are also adding valuable content (is it unique? written specifically for the offer?), which is actually great and it is what Google wants.
So, in my humble opinion you are everything that you are supposed to do. Keep it that way!
Hope that helps!
Hi Peter,
It is widely known now that any kind of compensation given for a link is against Google TOS (that includes affiliate links, "powered by" links, PRs, sponsored posts, etc). All of them should be not followed, in that way, you still get the people that may want the services you offer without affecting Google rankings.
There are some rel alternatives that could help Google recognize those links and not count them towards your rankings (or counting them differently). Take the case of Wordpress, most of their hosted blogs have a "powered by" link, but they use rel="generator" which helps Google distinguish between spam and "powered by" links.
Anyway, there are 2 sides of the coin here. Google said that affiliate links should be nofollow, but I still see sites that have hundreds of thousands of links (over 95% of their link profile) from affiliates, which are followed and not blocked by anything and the site ranks 1st.
I would recommend to nofollow those links, but that is my approach. I even created a javascript method to insert our affiliate links (including the nofollow tag), still, we are ranked 10th on the same query that the site I mentioned above ranks 1st.
Hope this answer helps you at least decide what is your approach and what to do...
Hi Armin, I'd suggest you take a look here: http://moz.com/community/q/domain-name-redirect-question
Look for Jesse's response.
Gregory, unfortunately, if you would like to succeed you will "need" those monthly contracts. There's no way to have success with short term contracts. If a company offers a "1 month SEO boost" you can be almost sure your site will be ruined the very next month you see a boost in your rankings. SEO should be done for the long run.
Moz lists there several companies, some do offer services only for large businesses but some do also offer for small businesses. Just need to do some research and ask for quotes.
Was the old site manually or algorithmically penalized? As making a 301 from a penalized site to a clean site will most likely forward the penalty to the new site.
If is wasn't, then my next question is why are you doing a 301 redirect from a Website that isn't in the same exact industry nor is the same Website? As that could lead to another penalty called backdoor pages, which is using other sites (not related or not entirely related) to gain more traffic on your site.
I'd suggest you undo the 301 and see what happens. It could take a couple weeks to see the results of the 301 removal.
Hope that helps!