Not showing in Google map listing. Why?
-
We have a client who's law firm is the highest google reviewed, on page two or three of St. Louis personal injury lawyer, but does not show in the map listing. Any ideas why this would happen or how to ensure they are viewable in the map listing?
-
Can you share the listing? I can provide some feedback with the NAP. Also, did it used to rank?
-
Hi David,
In the past, I have done a lot of work with Hotels in this arena. Their market is super competitive and varies by country.
I found that various schema with geo coordinates/contact info and hasmap showing the Google Maps link, links to relevant local businesses/newspaper sites, uniform NAPU and localised content on the site saying, for example, what is available around the hotel with travel times and distances.
People search for hotels by location once they have refined their search to staying at a hotel over other accommodation options. This does vary in the UK however over the US. Google Map Listings in general are slightly different here in the UK.
I would have a read of some of the articles on DealerOn, there could be some gems in there for you:
http://www.dealeron.com/about-us/leadership-team/greg-gifford/
Also here is what Google says about prominence:
Prominence
Prominence refers to how well known a business is. Some places are more prominent in the offline world, and search results try to reflect this in local rankings. For example, famous museums, landmark hotels or well-known shop brands that are familiar to many people are also likely to be more prominent in local search results.
Prominence is also based on information that Google has about a business from across the web (such as links, articles and directories). Google review count and score are also factored into local search ranking – more reviews and positive ratings will improve a business's local ranking. Your position in web results is also a factor, so SEO best practices apply to local search optimisation.
There's no way to request or pay for a better local ranking on Google. We do our best to keep the details of the search algorithm confidential to make the ranking system as fair as possible for everyone.
Is there anything in this specifically that could be improved, articles, reviews, basic overall SEO including schema mark up?
-
Looking for a more advanced answer.
We have Moz Local, Yext, and a TON of manual listings outside of those two. All match, all are accurate and have the same info displayed.
I am wanting to know what influences the Google map listings directly. It's strange because you will also see businesses that do not rank organically on page one in search but do show up in the maps pack. And sometimes the opposite. Sites that rank in the top 5 not showing in the maps pack.
-
The basic premise is that Google needs to trust the information you supply in your Google My Business account. So here we are talking about the NAP(U) information - Name, Address, Phone Number and URL. So once you set up a GMB account Google goes to various sources online to check the validity of the information you have supplied (directories etc). So think uniformity of your NAP(U) information. Google needs to see that where ever your NAP(U) info is mentioned online that it is consistent, this therefore, builds trust in the information you supply.
Where issues can occur are with aggregator directories. Certain directories online spread your information to other directories, so if your information is inaccurate in one directory this could be spread to other places.
Have a read of Greg Difford's stuff online, he has a site called DealerOn. He is a guru on all things local, he speaks at events all over the world so there are some good videos out there.
Moz Local is good at getting all your NAP(U) details uniform online also BrightLocal are decent.
-
Signed up using Moz Local?
Is his address a st. Louis proper address or a suburb? That makes a difference.
Local SEO also pulls from various review sites. Not just google. May need more reviews there.
Local SEO is a fun one. Moz has some great resources, but I would sign him up for Moz Local pronto to see if that helps.
-
Create a Google My Business account and have it verified (by postal mail)
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
How Google recognises Brand name? And ignores attested keywords?
Hi community, Our company name got attested with our industry keyword over the years; which also primary keyword of our homepage and all of our industry competitors. Best example is... Moz turns to Moz SEO for fraction of the audience or users. Again this is an example. Now if Google thinks "Moz" is only the company name, does it ignores the word "seo" completely? Or Google gives negative score for employing "seo" after "Moz" across all pages? Does the "seo" word will be considered or ignored in this case? How Google recognises the company name? Thanks
Algorithm Updates | | vtmoz0 -
What is the appropriate Robot.txt to unblock if Google cannot get all the resources from my homepage?
Hello everyone. I did some research as to why my website has decreased in the Google search rankings recently. After reading this Yoast article I believe it's because the robot.txt files I have set up on my wordpress website. The following is a screen shot of the results of a fetch & render query of my webpage.Googlebot couldn't get all resources for this page. Here's a list: URL Type Reason http://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Open+Sans:400,600,700,800%7CPT+Sans:400,400italic,700,700italic%7COswald:400,300,700&subset=latin,latin-ext Style Sheet Denied by robots.txt http://www.kmollinslaw.com/wp-content/plugins/slick-contact-forms/css/admin.css?ver=3.9.1 Style Sheet Denied by robots.txt http://www.kmollinslaw.com/wp-content/plugins/contact-form-plugin/css/style.css?ver=3.9.1 Style Sheet Denied by robots.txt http://www.kmollinslaw.com/wp-content/plugins/hupso-share-buttons-for-twitter-facebook-google/style.css?ver=3.9.1 Style Sheet Denied by robots.txt http://www.kmollinslaw.com/wp-content/plugins/latest-post-accordian-slider/css/lpaccordion.css?ver=3.9.1 Style Sheet Denied by robots.txt http://www.kmollinslaw.com/wp-content/plugins/latest-post-accordian-slider/css/style.css?ver=3.9.1 Style Sheet Denied by robots.txt http://www.kmollinslaw.com/wp-content/plugins/revslider/rs-plugin/css/settings.css?rev=4.1.1&ver=3.9.1 Style Sheet Denied by robots.txt http://www.kmollinslaw.com/wp-content/plugins/revslider/rs-plugin/css/dynamic-captions.css?rev=4.1.1&ver=3.9.1 Style Sheet Denied by robots.txt http://www.kmollinslaw.com/wp-content/plugins/revslider/rs-plugin/css/static-captions.css?rev=4.1.1&ver=3.9.1 Style Sheet Denied by robots.txt http://www.kmollinslaw.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-email-capture/inc/css/wp-email-capture-styles.css?ver=1.0 Style Sheet Denied by robots.txt http://www.kmollinslaw.com/wp-content/themes/infographer/style.css?ver=3.9.1 Style Sheet Denied by robots.txt http://www.kmollinslaw.com/wp-content/themes/infographer/css/stylesheet.min.css?ver=3.9.1 Style Sheet Denied by robots.txt http://www.kmollinslaw.com/wp-content/themes/infographer/css/style_dynamic.php?ver=3.9.1 Style Sheet Denied by robots.txt http://www.kmollinslaw.com/wp-content/themes/infographer/css/custom_css.php?ver=3.9.1 Style Sheet Denied by robots.txt http://www.kmollinslaw.com/wp-content/plugins/convertable-contact-form-builder-analytics-and-lead-management-dashboard/assets/css/convertable.css?ver=3.9.1 Style Sheet Denied by robots.txt http://www.kmollinslaw.com/wp-content/plugins/google-maps-widget/css/gmw.css?ver=1.66 Style Sheet Denied by robots.txt http://www.kmollinslaw.com/wp-content/plugins/acurax-social-media-widget/style.css?ver=3.9.1 Style Sheet Denied by robots.txt http://www.kmollinslaw.com/wp-includes/js/swfobject.js?ver=2.2-20120417 Script Denied by robots.txt My current robot.txt settings are as follows; User-agent: * Disallow: /wp-admin/ Disallow: /wp-includes/ Disallow: */xmlrpc.php Disallow: */wp-*.php Disallow: */trackback/ Disallow: *?wptheme= Disallow: *?comments= Disallow: *?replytocom Disallow: */comment-page- Disallow: *?s= Disallow: */wp-content/ Allow: */wp-content/uploads/ ```What to I need to allow/disallow to allow Google spiders to properly read my website?
Algorithm Updates | | gamesotd0 -
Struggling with Google Bot Blocks - Please help!
I own a site called www.wheretobuybeauty.com.au After months and months we still have a serious issue with all pages having blocked URLs according to Google Webmaster Tools. The 404 errors are returning a 200 header code according to the email below. Do you agree that the 404.php code should be changed? Can you do that please ? The current state: Google webmaster tools Index Status shows: 26,000 pages indexed 44,000 pages blocked by robots. In late March, we implemented a change recommended by an SEO expert and he provided a new robots.txt file, advised that we should amend sitemap.xml and other changes. We implemented those changes and then setup a re-index of the site by google. The no of blocked URLs eventually reduced in May and June to 1,000 for a few days – but now the problem has rapidly returned. The no of pages that are displayed in a google search request of www.google.com.au where the query was ‘site:wheretobuybeauty.com.au’ is 37,000: This new site has been re-crawled over last 4 weeks. About the site This is a Linux php site and has the following: 55,000 URLs in sitemap.xml submitted successfully to webmaster tools robots.txt file has been modified several times: Firstly we had none Then we created one but were advised that it needed to have this current content: User-agent: * Disallow: Sitemap: http://www.wheretobuybeauty.com.au/sitemap.xml
Algorithm Updates | | socialgrowth0 -
De-indexed homepage in Google - very confusing.
A website I provide content for has just suffered a de-indexed homepage in Google (not in any of the other search engines) - all the other pages remained indexed as usual. Client asked me what might be the problem and I just couldn't figure it out - no linkbuilding has ever been carried out so clean backlink profile, etc. I just resubmitted it and it's back in its usual place, and has maintained the rankings (and PR) it had before it disappeared a few days ago. I checked WMT and no warnings or issues there. Any idea why this might've happened?
Algorithm Updates | | McTaggart0 -
Google is forcing a 301 by truncating our URLs
Just recently we noticed that google has indexed truncated urls for many of our pages that get 301'd to the correct page. For example, we have:
Algorithm Updates | | mmac
http://www.eventective.com/USA/Massachusetts/Bedford/107/Doubletree-Hotel-Boston-Bedford-Glen.html as the url linked everywhere and that's the only version of that page that we use. Google somehow figured out that it would still go to the right place via 301 if they removed the html filename from the end, so they indexed just: http://www.eventective.com/USA/Massachusetts/Bedford/107/ The 301 is not new. It used to 404, but (probably 5 years ago) we saw a few links come in with the html file missing on similar urls so we decided to 301 them instead thinking it would be helpful. We've preferred the longer version because it has the name in it and users that pay attention to the url can feel more confident they are going to the right place. We've always used the full (longer) url and google used to index them all that way, but just recently we noticed about 1/2 of our urls have been converted to the shorter version in the SERPs. These shortened urls take the user to the right page via 301, so it isn't a case of the user landing in the wrong place, but over 100,000 301s may not be so good. You can look at: site:www.eventective.com/usa/massachusetts/bedford/ and you'll noticed all of the urls to businesses at the top of the listings go to the truncated version, but toward the bottom they have the full url. Can you explain to me why google would index a page that is 301'd to the right page and has been for years? I have a lot of thoughts on why they would do this and even more ideas on how we could build our urls better, but I'd really like to hear from some people that aren't quite as close to it as I am. One small detail that shouldn't affect this, but I'll mention it anyway, is that we have a mobile site with the same url pattern. http://m.eventective.com/USA/Massachusetts/Bedford/107/Doubletree-Hotel-Boston-Bedford-Glen.html We did not have the proper 301 in place on the m. site until the end of last week. I'm pretty sure it will be asked, so I'll also mention we have the rel=alternate/canonical set up between the www and m sites. I'm also interested in any thoughts on how this may affect rankings since we seem to have been hit by something toward the end of last week. Don't hesitate to mention anything else you see that may have triggered whatever may have hit us. Thank you,
Michael0 -
Google penalty for one keyword?
Is it possible to get penalized by Google for a specific keyword and essentially disappear from the SERPs for that keyword but keep position for the brand (#1) and some other keywords (#4 and #7)? And how would you find out that this is what happened if there is no GWT message?
Algorithm Updates | | gfiedel0 -
Can a google data refresh knock your pages out of the rankings?
I see that around mid November 2013 a handful of my sites pages dropped off of Google completely. It was around the data refreshes in November, and while everyone says it doesn't effect that much I was wondering if anyone knew if it could knock some of my pages out of the rankings for a specific keyword. Note - we had previously held muliple listings for different pages on our site for this particular keyword. Google kept the highest ranking and knocked the lower ones off. See attached image of our keyword ranking history to see what I mean. DcJJM0M
Algorithm Updates | | franchisesolutions0 -
Source for how many searches are done on Google per day?
Hi, All! The figure I've seen going around is 3 billion and is attributed to ComScore, but in the comScore press release that was linked to (actually the one from Rand's article - http://www.seomoz.org/blog/21-tactics-to-increase-blog-traffic-2012) all I could find was percentage of market share, but no total numbers of searches. Anyone have a source on that? Thanks, Aviva
Algorithm Updates | | debi_zyx0