Hiding Links Under A Tab As Good As Anything Else And More Attractive?
-
I'm working with a site that finds standard linking to spread authority to interior pages ugly. Here's what they don't like:
-
footers
-
tag clouds
-
sidebar lists of links
-
text heavy paragraphs with links
-
a gallery of images with alt text/links
So, I'm looking for other ways to link from their homepage to these less prominent pages inside the site. Here are my two questions:
1. Would something like this work, with the links under the "Specs" tab (p.s., this is just a random example and not my client):
http://www.goincase.com/products/detail/CL57925/
2. Any other ideas for spreading the authority via links from their homepage and other pages on the site to less powerful pages?
Thanks! Best...Mike
-
-
Hey, thanks Sheldon!
-
In my opinion, there's nothing greyhat about those tabs, Mike. The mouseover makes it quite obvious that it's a navigation link, and in reality, you're not even taking the user to another page. I wouldn't hesitate to use it myself.
-
Thanks Ryan!
I think it's a technique that could lend itself to borderline grey hatness, just because it doesn't really seem geared to the user and you could really bury a ton of links. In this particular example, the links don't appear as links until you roll over them. Maybe just a design goof. Thanks!
-
The links are clearly visible in HTML so Google will pick up on them. The links are accessible to visitors. It is basically a different form of a drop down menu. You click the menu button, then the page changes not terribly unlike a frame.
My gut feeling is this is grey hat SEO, but I can't place my finger on where it crosses the line. A webmaster can say "hey, the links are clear and available to anyone who wants to see or use them." and they would be right.
What makes it grey to me is clearly most visitors would never see those links.
Overall, I would be ok with using that technique, but I would give preference to the image idea I shared if that was a reasonable option.
I would be interested to hear feedback from others on the topic.
-
I'm probably not explaining it very well. Sorry.
You go here: http://www.goincase.com/products/detail/CL57925/
You click on the "Specs" tab. You get a new tab which breaks down info by "Compatability, Color, Styles & Sku". Under "Styles" there's a line that reads:
"black, CMJ, convertible, ipad, iPad2, iPad 2, snap, snap case"
Those links.
-
I must be missing something. I do not see any line for Styles.
I did a CTRL+F for Specs and their is only one instance of Specs on the page. I did a search for "styles" and that term is not found on this page.
Here is a link to a screenshot of what I see: http://www.terapvp.com/data/external/specs.jpg
-
Hi Ryan,
Thanks for the message. I only say "hiding" in the sense of making text links less prominent design-wise. So, instead of having columns of text links, to do something more attractive, maybe with images or tabs or something.
On the example under the "Specs" tab, there's a line for "Styles." Those terms are links to other pages.
Do you think those links under "Styles" get picked up by a Google bot and valued as well as any other kind of link?
Thanks! Best...Mike
-
Hi Mike.
Would something like this work, with the links under the "Specs" tab?
I am not clear on what you mean when you refer to links under the Specs tab. I do see the Specs tab on the site you mentioned. I see it in a navigation bar: About, Features, Specs, Reviews. That is a perfectly acceptable way to offer a link. There is nothing hidden about it. Am I missing something?
Any other ideas for spreading the authority via links from their homepage?
The only idea that comes to mind to "hide" links is you can link images to the links. If you have a site similar to the one you mentioned, you can have a line of thumbnail images of various products with each image being a link to a different page within your site.
The moment you say "hiding" alarms go off in my head. As long as the link is clearly visible and usable to visitors, then there is no problem with it. You certainly do not have to call attention to the link, but if you actually hide it, you've crossed the black hat line.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Can I safely asume that links between subsites on a subdirectories based multisite will be treated as internal links within a single site by Google?
I am building a multisite network based in subdirectories (of the mainsite.com/site1 kind) where the main site is like a company site, and subsites are focused on brands or projects of that company. There will be links back and forth from the main site and the subsites, as if subsites were just categories or pages within the main site (they are hosted in subfolders of the main domain, after all). Now, Google's John Mueller has said: <<as far="" as="" their="" url="" structure="" is concerned,="" subdirectories="" are="" no="" different="" from="" pages="" and="" subpages="" on="" your="" main="" site.="" google="" will="" do="" its="" best="" to="" identify="" where="" sites="" separate="" using="" but="" the="" is="" same="" for="" a="" single="" site,="" you="" should="" assume="" that="" seo="" purposes,="" network="" be="" treated="" one="">></as> This sounds fine to me, except for the part "Google will do its best to identify where sites are separate", because then, if Google establishes that my multisite structure is actually a collection of different sites, links between subsites and mainsite would be considered backlinks between my own sites, which could be therefore considered a link wheel, that is, a kind of linking structure Google doesn't like. How can I make sure that Google understand my multisite as a unique site? P.S. - The reason I chose this multisite structure, instead of hosting brands in categories of the main site, is that if I use the subdirectories based multisite feature I will be able to map a TLD domain to any of my brands (subsites) whenever I'd choose to give that brand a more distinct profile, as if it really was a different website.
Web Design | | PabloCulebras0 -
Are there any hard rules about internal linking of homepage?
Hi all, Usually we link homepage from all pages. That's definitely a boost for homepage to rank well. Do we need to interlink homepage to the highest? Including links from subdomains or sub directories. Thanks
Web Design | | vtmoz0 -
Using a query string for linked, static landing pages - is this good practice?
My company has a page with links for each of our dozen office locations as well as a clickable map. These offices are also linked in the footer of every page along with their phone number. When one of these links is clicked, the visitor is directed to a static page with a picture of the office, contact information, a short description, and some other information. The URL for these pages is displayed as something like http:/example.com/offices.htm?office_id=123456, with seemingly random ID numbers at the end depending on the office that remain static. I know first off that this is probably bad SEO practice, as the URL should be something like htttp://example.com/offices/springfield/ My question is, why is there a question mark in the page URL? I understand that it represents a query string, but I'm not sure why it's there to begin with. A search query should not required if they are just static landing pages, correct?. Is there any reason at all why they would be queries? Is this an issue that needs to be addressed or does it have little to no impact on SEO?
Web Design | | BD690 -
Domain Consolidation & Proper Linking Strategy?
We have a client that operates 5 gyms in 5 different part of Miami, and each gym has its own website. All sites rank well and have a a good pagerank. For the purpose of their marketing and brand they would like 1 website developed which includes all of their gyms which we are launching later today. Each gym will have it's own landing page within the website Should we redirect the URL's of the different websites to the individual landing pages on the new site or how should that work to minimize any penalties on our SEO. For example (these are fake url's): www.gymA.com, www.gymB.com, www.gymC.com, www.gymD.com The new url: www.gym.com New landing pages:
Web Design | | POPCreative
www.gym.com/gymA, www.gym.com/gymB, www.gym.com/gymC, www.gym.com/gymD Should we do a redirect from: www.gymA.com to www.gym.com/gymA www.gymB.com to www.gym.com/gymB www.gymC.com to www.gym.com/gymC www.gymD.com to www.gym.com/gymD Thank you in advanced. If there is a better way to do this, or anything extra I need to know, that would be great. Thanks!0 -
After a website redesign, what is the impact and is it a good practice to use /v2/ naming convention?
Hi mightyful SEOMoz community. We just launched a redesign of our commercial website from https://www.data-field.com to https://www.data-field.com/v2/ All URLs from previous website were 301 permanent redirect to the appropriate page in the new website, and the root domains ( /, /v2/ ) send the users to their own language content /v2/en/, /v2/fr/, /v2/zh/ Up to here everything is fine. But then I setup the usual "Share" buttons, only to find that they were displaying a "0" count. Then I realized that it was because of the root URL change from / to /v2/ My question is the following: 1. Is using /v2/ a good practice? 2. If yes, then should I link the Social tool to https://www.data-field.com/ ( only ) instead of linking it to the actual page in the address bar? Thanks for your answers.
Web Design | | NicolasE0 -
Decreasing Page Load Time with Placeholder Images - Good Idea or Bad Idea?
In an effort to decease our page load time, we are looking at making a change so that all product images on any page past page 1 load with a place holder image. When the user clicks to the next page, it then loads all of the images for that page. Right now, all of the product divs are loaded into a Javascript array and loaded in chunks to the page display div. Product-heavy pages significantly increase load time as the browser loads all of the images from the product HTML before the Javascript can rewrite the display div with page-specific product HTML. In order to get around this, we are looking at loading the product HTML with a small placeholder image and then substituting the appropriate product image URLs when each page is output to the display div. From a user experience, this change will be seamless and they won't be able to tell the difference, plus they will benefit from a potentially a short wait on loading the images for the page in question. However, the source of the page will have all of the product images in a given category page all having the same image. How much of a negative impact will this have on SEO?
Web Design | | airnwater0 -
Anyone have a good example of a CSS-based multi-level nav bar that is semantic (including link level subordination) and is ux positive?
Anyone have a good example of CSS-based multi-level nav bar that is semantic (including link level subordination) and is ux positive? Or am I gonna have to actually make one? Anyone have a good example of CSS-based multi-level nav bar that is semantic (including link level subordination) and is ux positive? Or am I gonna have to actually make one?
Web Design | | anns0 -
Is it more beneficial to have internal links without the full file path?
When linking internally in my site is it more beneficial to have links written like, Fast Blenders OR Fast Blenders
Web Design | | tickettoss0